What library?

Latest post Wed, Nov 18 2009 1:20 PM by norcider. 115 replies.
  • Tue, Oct 13 2009 8:54 PM In reply to

    • frigian
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 8 2009
    • Posts 3

    Re: What library?

    http://www.clpgh.org/about

    http://www.clpgh.org/about/trustees.html

    From the Library website. Wonder how many of them have acutally visited a library in the last 10 years.

    Board of Trustees
    Executive Committee
    Jacqui Fiske Lazo, Chair
    Roy Dorrance, First Vice Chair
    Joan Gulley, Second Vice Chair
    JoAnne Burley, Secretary
    Lou Testoni, Treasurer
    Pat Siger
    Betsy Watkins
    Members
    Carolyn Hess Abraham
    Henry Beukema (Term Trustee - Term Ending Annual Meeting 2010)
    Reverend Ricky V. Burgess (City Council Member)
    Cynthia Busch (Term Trustee - Term Ending Annual Meeting 2010)
    Oliver Byrd (Life Trustee)
    Theresa Colaizzi
    Senator Jay Costa, Jr. (Term Trustee - Term Ending Annual Meeting 2011)
    Greg Cummings (Term Trustee - Term Ending Annual Meeting 2009)
    John DeFazio (County Representative)
    Debby Dodds (Term Trustee - Term Ending Annual Meeting 2011)
    Representative Dan Frankel (Term Trustee - Term Ending Annual Meeting 2011)
    Donald Fischer
    Diane Holder (Term Trustee - Term Ending Annual Meeting 2011)
    Susan Jackson (Term Trustee - Term Ending Annual Meeting 2011)
    Bob Kollar
    Bruce Kraus (City Representative)
    Barbara Logan (County Representative)
    Frank J. Lucchino (Life Trustee)
    Chuck McCullough (County Representative)
    Kathleen McGuire (Term Trustee - Term Ending Annual Meeting 2010)
    Kristen McMahon (Term Trustee - Term Ending Annual Meeting 2010)
    Alice Mitinger (County Representative)
    Nikki Monroe-Hines (Term Trustee - Term Ending Annual Meeting 2010)
    James Motznik (City Representative)
    Tonya Payne (City Representative)
    Leonard Perfido (Life Trustee)
    Kevin Pickels (Term Trustee - Term Ending Annual Meeting 2011)
    Carol Robinson - (Life Trustee)
    Terri Wolfe (City of Pittsburgh Mayor Representative)
     
    Trustee Emeriti
    Marcia M. Gumberg
    Henry Hillman
    Henry P. Hoffstot, Jr.
    J. Sherman McLaughlin
    James M. Walton
    Ann Wardrop


  • Wed, Oct 14 2009 8:40 AM In reply to

    • inge
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 8 2009
    • Posts 1

    Re: What library?

     

  • Wed, Oct 14 2009 1:34 PM In reply to

    Re: What library?

     Ok already.... we have a lot of people to blame for the problems with the libraries starting from the very top... plus the board.  I totally agree with that.  But my questions is where is this "Blame Game" going to get us?  Is it going to just get a few people fired?  I'm all for that actually but....

    What is our end goal here? 

    To save our libraries! 

    What do we need to get this accomplised?  Money and lots of it! 

    Where are we going to get this money from?  Anybody know Bill Gates?  We have to put our heads together and find funders.  Unfortunately the library needs big money!  Increasing fines and small change in a collection jar will help a little but it won't keep the branches open. 

    Pressure needs to be put on all elected officials.....this is their job.... they have been elected to serve us.  If we speak up loudly enough they will do something.  We need an outcry from out communities and not just the ones immediately effected but all of them because this is only the first round of cuts... there could be more and next time it could be your library.

    I can imagine Hazelwood without a library but I don't want to because it's not a pretty picture!

     

     

  • Thu, Oct 15 2009 6:09 PM In reply to

    • emmaw
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 15 2009
    • Posts 3

    Re: What library?

    Neither 25 full-time staff layoffs nor closings nor mergers/moves are necessary. Sufficient, long-term funding can be found if there is a real commitment to our libraries.

    Let's demand 1. a halt to the closings/mergers/moves and layoffs, and 2. a commitment to community-supported solutions from CLP administration, the CLP Board, and from our elected officials (who we may not elect soon if they don't find funding).

    Find contact info here:

    http://carnegielibrary.org/about/support/advocate/index.cfm#contact

    and/or get in touch with libraries slated for closure to find out what events/actions they're planning.

     

  • Fri, Oct 16 2009 3:17 PM In reply to

    Re: What library?

     

    This is from Eleventh Stack, the CLP Main blog written by librarians:

    The library is more important than you.

    The library is more important than you. The library is more important than its librarians. The library is more important than the materials on its shelves, screens, and speakers. The library is more important than the buildings that house those materials. The library is more important than its director. The library is more important than the newspaper, the TV and radio stations, and all of their reporters. The library is more important than the mayor, city council, congresspersons, the governor, and every candidate for those offices. The library is more important than the state budget and the rest of its funding sources. The library is more important than Andrew Carnegie.

    The library is more important, because its potential for change and growth extends beyond you, to your family, your neighbors, and your community.  The library is not just a symbol or a luxury. It is a cornerstone for an informed society to build its future. Anyone can use the library's resources to become the next librarian, director, mayor, reporter, congressperson, governor, anything. The library is open to anyone to educate herself and her children without agenda or bias, to entertain himself with the media of his choice, to find employment, to research and read and listen and write and watch.

    In my cover letter to apply for this job, I wrote, “Libraries, as a free source of unrestricted public education, are a vital part of our communities.”  Now that I work here, I know that to be true. It says right above the door: Free to the People. The library is not more important than the people. Who are the People?  That’s you.

    A librarian I work with said, “Good questions are more important than answers.” A good question has the ability to stir in us a force as powerful as hunger. So ask, Pittsburgh. Make demands.  Tell the director.  Tell the papers.  Tell the mayor.  Tell the citycounty and state representatives how you feel about branches closing in your neighborhood and your neighbors’ neighborhoods, what you think about library funding, how you feel about losing library workers to assist you, access to information, and hours of operation in which to access it.

    And then ask yourself.  Beyond just fighting to maintain the staus quo, what do you want from the library?  What does the best library you can imagine look like?

    Are buildings open 8 am to 10 pm?  Do shelves stock the newest, most popular and obscure titles?  Do computers whirr and flash with the most up-to-date information, just waiting for you to hit enter?

    Do Children’s Departments abound with storytimes and creative play?  Do Teen spaces overflow with engaged, excited young people?  Do event calendarslist informative, cultural and educational, thought-provoking programs for everyone?

    Do reference departments include the most useful resources to help you accomplish your goals?  Do desks staff energetic employees, motivated and enabled to connect you with what you seek?  Do employees have the means to pursue the latest technologies and methods to assist your search?  Do you come here to find employment, relax, and study?  Is this the place you visit to feel safe, informed, and inspired?

    Do patrons feel ownership of this organization?  Are they vocal? Do they contribute their ideas and resources to supporting it?  Do they encourage their government to endorse the institution they value so much?

    Is your ideal library a humming center in a vibrant community of empowered, engaged, autonomous citizens?  What has to happen for all of this to come true?  What is your part?

    The library is more important than this crisis.  The library is as important as you make it.  All of this is possible.  All of this is yours for the asking.

     


     

  • Fri, Oct 16 2009 6:14 PM In reply to

    • lucille
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 8 2009
    • Posts 5

    Re: What library?

    This post is beautiful! How could anyone say anything better than this?

  • Fri, Oct 16 2009 11:33 PM In reply to

    • lizzylib
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, May 28 2009
    • Posts 3

    Re: What library?

     LVSteve- Board meetings are indeed open to the public and should be on your library's event calendar.  If it isn't ask when the meetings are held.

  • Sat, Oct 17 2009 12:20 AM In reply to

    Re: What library?

    In this case incorrect.  The Carnegie isn't required to adhere to the same sunshine practices as a state, county or city agency would; it isn't any of those.  Carnegie board meetings are not open meetings -- maybe they should be!  It is obvious that neither the library administration or the library board have any desire to look out for community interests.  Other then the RAD, they don't seem to be responsive to voters, residents, or employees.

  • Sat, Oct 17 2009 1:20 PM In reply to

    • LVsteve
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Sun, Oct 11 2009
    • Posts 4

    Re: What library?

    Mark A.:

    In this case incorrect.  The Carnegie isn't required to adhere to the same sunshine practices as a state, county or city agency would; it isn't any of those.  Carnegie board meetings are not open meetings -- maybe they should be!  It is obvious that neither the library administration or the library board have any desire to look out for community interests.  Other then the RAD, they don't seem to be responsive to voters, residents, or employees.

     

     Mark A. -

    Thank you. Yes people, it's apparently true. I mentioned this to another staff member the other day and they confirmed (again, as far as they were aware) that the board meetings are not public and that while it's probably possible to petition them to appear......well, who knows.  What bothers me is the lack of publicity either way. Either make them public and publicize the where and when, or don't make them public and explain why - or at least try to explain, which I think would be difficult, since they're discussing the use of tax dollars, which is another reason contact information for them should also be made public (for the non-politicos). Why does the director's office have to be the intermediary for correspondence? Why the filter?

     

     

  • Mon, Oct 19 2009 4:09 PM In reply to

    • emmaw
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 15 2009
    • Posts 3

    Re: What library?

    http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09292/1006721-100.stm

    The mayor will meet with the community about library closings this Saturday morning.

    He needs to stop being so aggressive and commit to figuring this out with the other relevant parties - Board/Directors/County/City Council.

    Maybe he needs to be pushed to make that a campaign promise.

     

     

  • Tue, Oct 20 2009 9:08 PM In reply to

    Re: What library?

     I'm glad that the Post Gazette is at least continuing to follow the library story, even if it is just turning into Luke's antics: http://www.postgazette.com/pg/09293/1006957-455.stm

    I hope that plenty of citizens will speak up at this meeting and convince him that while he bickers about nonsense, we still need our libraries.

  • Wed, Oct 21 2009 10:18 AM In reply to

    Re: What library?

    Agreed, the boy-mayor is a Johnny-come-lately to the issue, hasn't made any helpful proposals and his "city residents contribute to the RAD" is cop-out nonsense.  It does take two to tango however, and the library's administration has been just as remiss.  Where is their strategy and direction, and how come there wasn't any effort made before their announcement to sit with local and county decision-makers to say "this is what's going to happen, what can we do to prevent it?"

    It also seems pretty obvious (though a 10 year old would have known better) that the library has been absolutely blindsided by the public response and outcry.  Who's advising Dr. Mistick, and where are the board members?  Has the time come to overhaul the Carnegie Library structure and have it run with real community representation, or based on the model of the Parks Conservancy.  It is a board disconnected from its constituencies and an administration equally disconnected from its staff.

  • Wed, Oct 21 2009 1:14 PM In reply to

    Re: What library?

     It appears to be heading down one of two roads:

    1-- The administration will defend their actions but will reverse the decisions because government officials will put on too much pressure.

    OR

    2-- They will go along with this well-orchstrated (and long thought out) plan and the director and her lackys will resign, which leaves noone to take the heat once then sham has been completed.

    They planned for this all along and NEVER gave any other option a chance.  Want a clue as to why this is true?  At the public meeting in May/June the question they posed to the public was --"What would you do if your library was closed?"  never "What can we do to keep it open?"

  • Wed, Oct 21 2009 3:11 PM In reply to

    Re: What library?

     Addressing the last post:

    1. There will be no reverse of the decision unless the city gets directly involved in the funding.

    2. Regardless of the percieved ineptitude of the administration; the current funding crisis did not happen overnight. RAD funding has always been inadequate and the library fights every year to get piddly increases. The funding has to be overhauled and perhaps the RAD board as well.

    3. I didn't see Lukey at the town hall meetings earlier this year. There must have been a celebrity golf tournament in town.

  • Wed, Oct 21 2009 4:42 PM In reply to

    • LVsteve
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Sun, Oct 11 2009
    • Posts 4

    Re: What library?

     I'd like to thank 'norcider' for that last post because it highlights the basic issue of funding sources and funding levels, which may tend to get lost in the 'blame game' going around.

    It is 100% true that the current financial crisis did not happen overnight. Anyone recall 2003? Right after Eddie became govenor he axed state funding to all libraries by 50% from 2002. And yes....I really did say 50%. For CLP that mean a loss of about two million dollars. The current levels of staffing and hours of operation at just about all locations is a result of that cut six years ago. About three years ago, if I recall, he made a big deal about ponying up some funds to the library, but what no one really thinks about is the fact that he took it away first, then makes a show of it when he gives some (not all) of it back like he's some great philanthropist!

    It is also 100% true that the library has to fight for any increases from the RAD board. While CLP is a contractual asset, which means that the RAD is legally obligated to fund it at a certain level, unlike the the sports stadiums, CLP is not guaranteed the same amount (or more) of funding for 'x' number of years (that would make too much sense. Only people like sports franchise owners - not you and I -  are allowed to benefit from that kind of logic). CLP must present long range plans to the RAD board every four or five years and hope for the best. 

    And the city....well, what can I say that hasn't already been said?  If Luke can say that city residents already contribute to library funding because as county residents they pay the 1% sales tax RAD gets, then I'd like Luke to explain why, if already I'm paying county property taxes, I'm also paying a 3% city wage tax? If he can claim it one way, I can claim it another. So Luke, if you're reading: I would prefer some of my (apparently) redundant city taxes to go towards funding the library and not the new 'juvy jail', or more trashcans, OK? Just think about it.

    The levels of ineptitude of the administration , and library board of trustees, whether 'perceived' or actual only factor into the equation once the funds become available - which is a topic in and of itself.

    Although, I would like to put this thought out there: I understand the difference between capital funds and operational funds - fine. My question is why do 'mom and dad' play favorites? What happend to dividing the first 15 million ten years ago, and now the 50+ million between 19 locations? Why does it all go to 3 or 4? Does anyone know what kind of positive things even 1 million dollars could do for a building like Lawrenceville? Anyone going to the meeting on Saturday want to ask this one?

    It's all about paying for priorities everybody. I went to my first hockey game ever last night and the whole time I'm there I'm trying to figure out what's so 'inadequate' about Mellon arena, not just for hockey, but for anything. Isn't a sold out venue a sold out venue no matter how old it is?

Page 7 of 8 (116 items) « First ... < Previous 4 5 6 7 8 Next > | RSS