I don’t think a run on banks, by savers removing their deposits, will result in any customer losing his/her money, if these deposits are under advertised insured limits. If your savings exceed insured limits, you will probably lose any accumulated interest on excessive funds and have to wait until insured amounts are covered before you can withdraw the non-insured cash, and that could take months or years!
If you think my opinion is bogus, and you are planning on withdrawing your savings and hiding them in a box, or drawer, or safe, don’t waste your time -- if the banks fail, paper currency will be almost worthless, and you’ll be penniless in a few weeks.
Take that paper currency and buy silver or gold. Many wealthy hedgers have bags of pre-1965 quarters that they plan to use if a total financial collapse materializes.
Please, please, please heed this advice, so if these dire predictions materialize, you will have something of value left from years of conscientious nest egg building.
Again, I don’t see this scenario unfolding, but I also thought bottled water and satellite radio were doomed to fail!
I agree with Pahuntr that our financial system is designed to discourage saving money in banks. Savers are ridiculed for being too conservative, but if this country had massive monetary reserves in bank savings accounts and CDs, our national debt, if we had any, would be manageable. America will never have a stable dollar until we get our debt obligations under control.
People who save money to pay for their children’s educations and retirement should be applauded and rewarded. The government should help citizens who help themselves, and not reward prodigals who are sybarites. I think the underprivileged need a helping hand, but not conspicuous consumers, who live beyond their adequate means.
I don't know who you support in this election, but neither candidate has proposed a competent plan for fixing our economy and that's disgraceful!