Iron City moves beer production to Latrobe

Latest post Sun, Jun 14 2009 12:50 PM by pinkribbon2. 34 replies.
  • Thu, Jun 11 2009 2:07 PM

    Iron City moves beer production to Latrobe

    Iron City Brewing announced Thursday that it will move production from its Lawrenceville plant to an idled Latrobe brewery, saying the 148-year-old plant will brew its last batch June 22 [ read PG story ].

    What do you think?

    To post your comments, sign in or join. All comments must be family-friendly; please read our Guide to Commenting.

     

     

  • Thu, Jun 11 2009 2:18 PM In reply to

    Re: Iron City moves beer production to Latrobe

    Good Riddance.  More room for Penn Brewery!

  • Thu, Jun 11 2009 2:38 PM In reply to

    Re: Iron City moves beer production to Latrobe

     Another business leaving Allegheny County and the City of Pittsburgh?  What a surprise!!!  Thanks to the inept politicans who think that taxing everying is the answer. 

     

  • Thu, Jun 11 2009 2:56 PM In reply to

    Re: Iron City moves beer production to Latrobe

     I wonder if they will pay their water bill in Latrobe?

  • Thu, Jun 11 2009 3:07 PM In reply to

    • PJD
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Tue, Apr 28 2009
    • Posts 4

    Re: Iron City moves beer production to Latrobe

    Considering how many neighborhood bars don't even have it on tap anymore, and the open bottles sitting on the bars being mostly Coors or Miller, and IC is no longer even served at ball games, it seems that the demise of the Iron City brewery is not taxes or unreasonable utility bills, but is simply that Pittsburgers are are making their drinking choices based on the what they see on TV.  One would think that IC could have used local pride to offset the huge advertising budgets of the big brewers, but apparently it doesn't wotk that way around here.

    Yes, it would be a good place for Penn Brewery move and/or expand to - it has much greater visibility and accessability.  The IC brewery already has an underused used beer-hall what would work perfectly for a new restaurant.

  • Thu, Jun 11 2009 3:38 PM In reply to

    • Rackman
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Fri, Jul 18 2008
    • Posts 7

    Re: Iron City moves beer production to Latrobe

     Certainly the local taxes and the lack of vision by the city politicians is part of the reason Iron City is leaving but the company itself has to bear the brunt of any financial issue they are having.  They have done nothing to compete with the onslaught of high quality micro beers.  Most local bars do not have Iron City or IC light on tap.  Advertising has been lackluster or non existent.  Maybe at one time Iron City was considered a good Lager beer but with the high quality of Micro beers it is not even considered adequate.  They have not reacted well to competition and are looking for a way out of the 'Burgh.  As much as I hate the city politicians, I can't completely blame them here.  I would suspect that once they make the move they will announce a few new products aimed at the micro brews that have hurt them as well as a product to possibly compete against Coors Light.  I think Coors Light is a lousy beer but Marketing, Advertising and new gimmicks keep it on the mind of consumers.     Iron City has done none of that except for the Aluminum bottle a few years back.  At the end of the day though, the beer is either good or not and most people apparently don't like enough to keep buying it.

  • Thu, Jun 11 2009 3:42 PM In reply to

    Re: Iron City moves beer production to Latrobe

     So GREHOUND,  Is this the kind of "Hope and Change" that you voted for?

  • Thu, Jun 11 2009 3:45 PM In reply to

    Re: Iron City moves beer production to Latrobe

    I grew up on Old Latrobe, and it was an end of an era when Rolling Rock moved out.  IC might not be the number one beer in Pittsburgh, but I'm really happy to see it survive and see the old brewing plant in Latrobe revived.

  • Thu, Jun 11 2009 3:54 PM In reply to

    Re: Iron City moves beer production to Latrobe

    Iron City has been in trouble with finances for as long as I have been drinking beer. It stems from a multitude of problems ranging from their seemingly inept brewing machinery to their, what I feel to be, ridiculous price point. If I could buy a case of Iron City bottles for less than a case of Yuengling or a case of Miller Lite I would buy Iron City nearly every time I stopped in at the beer distributer. Unfortunatly, that is not the case.

    Am I sad to see the brewery move? Sure, it's one less business in Pittsburgh and that's never a good thing. However, if they did have to move I'm glad it's just right down the road. Hopefully the brewing process / machinery at the former Rolling Rock plant can add a bit more quality to the Iron City brand.

  • Thu, Jun 11 2009 3:56 PM In reply to

    • EdnaZ
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Jun 11 2009
    • Posts 1

    Re: Iron City moves beer production to Latrobe

     I find it completely repulsive that the President of Pittsburgh Brewing would call this news "exciting".     This is certainly the beginning of the end of Iron City Beer.    This beer will never touch my lips nor the lips of anyone in my family!

     

     

  • Thu, Jun 11 2009 5:08 PM In reply to

    • BeerFan
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Jun 11 2009
    • Posts 1

    Re: Iron City moves beer production to Latrobe

    More room for Penn Brewery?  Where is Penn Brewery now?  Are they still open?  Last I heard they were brewing in Wilkes-Barre PA.  I stopped buying their beer once they made up stories about rent increases and laid off their brewers.  The beer isn't the same, it is offensive compared to what used to be made there.

    As for Iron, maybe it will taste better now that will be brewing at a better modern facility.  At least it is somewhat local.  Such a shame no one in town is doing any production.  A handful of brewpubs and thats it.  Hof Brau haus even imports beer in from Germany as well as what they brew.

    Good for Iron and good for Latrobe.  Good luck. 

  • Thu, Jun 11 2009 7:32 PM In reply to

    • username
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Jun 11 2009
    • Posts 1

    Re: Iron City moves beer production to Latrobe

    Western PA needs to think regionally.

    Iron City had two other options, leave the region or completely close shop.

  • Fri, Jun 12 2009 1:51 AM In reply to

    • ckleloup
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Fri, Jun 12 2009
    • Posts 1

    Re: Iron City moves beer production to Latrobe

     Pittsburgh is losing an institution almost as iconic as the Steelers and Pirates. The city is losing a substantial part of its own identitity. While we could argue that this is entirely the fault of the brewery and its product, they are only a part of the equation. People in the city and region who drink American style lagers have  simply not been purchasing Iron City, but rather ,Coors, Miller, and Budweiser.  This is a decades long trend. Some of this is due to advertisement. But again, as we all know, the quality of the product has had an enormous impact on sales as well. Still, the blue collar beer drinker was not choosing Iron, something he or she could have done without losing much of anything  in regards to taste and value.

    Ultimately though, the bulk of the blame needs to be placed on the ownership post IC Light and Sam Adams. Let us not forget that these two beers were developed at Pittsburgh Brewing. It is this sort of ingenuity that the brewery has lacked over the last two decades. While the aluminum bottle was an attempt, it was literally just a repackaging of the same old product. Yuengling, a product not much different from Iron City in quality or consumer appeal, is more successful than ever. Their brewery figures prominently in their iconography. Go figure.

    My guess is that the current owners of the brewery will take the low road and put out an inferior product and attempt to sell it cheaply, while also controlling the old brewery so that it cannot be reopened as regional competition. They will damage the brand in such a way that it will not be usable as a core product in the future for the company after the present owners tank. Maybe some hobbiest like Mark Cuban will buy out these jerks and return the label to strength, but I doubt it.

  • Fri, Jun 12 2009 5:32 AM In reply to

    Re: Iron City moves beer production to Latrobe

    As someone whose father and grandfather worked at Iron City, and who worked there for a short time myself, I had hoped that this day wouldn't come. That maybe finally someone other than a crook, who cared about keeping the brewery and Iron City Beer and keeping it in Pittsburgh, would emerge against all odds. Unfortunately, it never happened, and this breaks my heart.

    Iron City has been hurting because a lot of the people who were loyal to the brand were turned off by the way the various yahoos who owned the place stuck it to them. Union members faced impossible choices. Over time, many finally were forced out, even after giving up more concessions than were fair. Not rich guys; not corporate fat cats -- mostly guys trying to support families and guys who had never done anything else. It was a bitter pill to swallow for people who'd worked there their whole lives, especially those who followed their dads and their dad's dads into the place.

    And the demise of the Pittsburgh Brewing Company wasn't because the beer isn't good, wasn't because the people who worked there didn't care. It was poor ownership, and everything went downhill from there. This whole saga has been a never-ending series of punches to the gut for the employees, their families and friends, and to anyone who likes the beer. At what point do you just say, I'm not going to support a place like that anymore?

    The real shame is that those who don't know about what has gone on at the brewery make assumptions that lead to so many misconceptions about PBC and ICB. People say "I guess the beer isn't any good and nobody wants to drink it. If they did, they'd make more money and not be in this situation." Not true and not fair. There still are plenty of people who like Iron City, even if it's not the college kids at a trendy Shady Side bar. The people at PBC had the bats taken out of their hands. Quite frankly, it's amazing the place hung around this long -- even in the sad state it's in now, if you can call that hanging around.

    Iron City Beer isn't for everyone; what beer is? These days, it's safe to say there are a few more choices out there. There are entire generations of young people who know nothing but designer beers and microbrews. And that's fine. But it's not like one day Pittsburgh woke up and nobody liked Iron City Beer and the place stopped making money. Don't believe that for a second.

    I'll admit it: part of enjoying Iron City is supporting your hometown. Part of it, at least for the workers and their families and friends, was pride in the product. Like it or not, it's Pittsburgh's beer. Unfortunately, the people who owned the place made it harder and harder on Pittsburghers to drink it, to support what they were doing. It's tough to blame someone who says they'll never pay a dime for another Iron. Just like it's hard to blame someone who says they're done buying tickets to Pirates games.

    It's sad because PBC is a part of Pittsburgh, it's history. Sure, being brewed in Latrobe is better than not being brewed at all. As for the operation leaving Lawrenceville, there finally were too many holes to plug in the dam that couldn't be plugged.

    Obviously, this hits a little closer to home for me than the average Pittsburgher. I just hope people know the real story. To just say "Oh, it's not even on tap at (fill in the blank) on the South Side" is like saying the Rolling Stones must not have been that good because they're not on the radio as much these days.

    Do people like Iron City Beer more than Budweiser or Miller or Coors or Sam Adams or Yuengling? I don't know. Probably not these days. But there are plenty of people in Pittsburgh who still like Iron. Some will stick with it because they always have. For others, this may be the last straw. And for every last straw comes closer the day when Iron City Beer no longer is worth brewing. That would be sad. I hope that day never comes. But then again, if you'd told me 25 years ago that one day they wouldn't make Iron in Lawrenceville, I would've said you were nuts.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Fri, Jun 12 2009 7:39 AM In reply to

    Re: Iron City moves beer production to Latrobe

    lowlander:

     So GREYHOUND,  Is this the kind of "Hope and Change" that you voted for?

     

     lowlander,

    The avitar I use is meant for satirical purposes only.  I am NOT a Hussein Obama supporter.  I am not a democrat. Actually, even the republicans are too far to the left for my opinions.

     

Page 1 of 3 (35 items) 1 2 3 Next > | RSS