Varsity Blog

Authors

Colin Dunlap, Rich Emert and Mike White of the P-G sports department blog about high school sports. 

Register to comment
Guide to commenting

Syndication

Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment

 Mike White| Wednesday, June 3, 9:35 p.m.

Fourteen years ago, Penn State defensive coordinator Tom Bradley sent a recruiting letter to Tom Ricketts. Ricketts was 3 years old at the time.

Bradley knew Ricketts' father, Tom II, and sent the letter as a joke. Fourteen years later, Bradley recruited the younger Ricketts for real - and got him.

The younger Tom Ricketts, who will be a senior lineman at North Allegheny High School, made a verbal commitment to Penn State tonight. He called Bradley on the phone and made his commitment.

Both Ricketts and his father talked tonight in a phone interview about the letter from Bradley and laughed about it. They have the letter framed in their home. Ricketts will sign a letter of intent with the Nittany Lions in February.

Ricketts is the second top WPIAL offensive lineman to commit to Penn State in the past two days. Yesterday, it was Fox Chapel's Miles Dieffenbach. Dieffenbach's decision was a slight blow to Pitt. The Panthers were his top choice until the past month, and the Panthers thought they had a good chance to get him. What hurt the most was Dieffenbach's tie to Pitt. His father, George, is Pitt's womens tennis coach.

Ricketts' decision might have been even a bigger blow to Pitt. Ricketts father, Tom II, was a standout lineman at Pitt in the 1980s. His mother, Sandy (Albright) Ricketts, was a standout swimmer at Pitt. The parents have season tickets to Pitt football games. Ricketts' great grandfather was Charles "Doc" Hartwig, who was a first-team All-American at Pitt in the 1930s.

But the youngest Tom Ricketts wasn't swayed by the family tree. Pitt was his other top choice, but he really started to feel strongly about Penn State after visiting the school in April.

"Penn State has always been my secret favorite," Ricketts said. "Growing up, Pitt was a favorite, too. But just looking at the opportunities given to me, Penn State was the best thing for me. ... This past week - and maybe even a little less than that - I was pretty sure Penn State is where I wanted to go. The past three days, I said, 'This is where I need to be.' I love the campus, the coaching staff, everything about Penn State."

More from young Tom about his commitment: "Really, it's just about the best fit for me - as a student and player. Maybe as Tom Ricketts' son, it might have been best for me at Pitt. But as Thomas Ricketts III, Penn State is where I need to be."

Ricketts also had Florida State, Maryland and Stanford on his final list, among others. He played offensive guard last year, but will play offensive tackle this season at North Allegheny.

Ricketts' father said he never tried to sway his son to Pitt or any other school and said he was "excited" about his son's decision. "Of course I would've loved to see him go to Pitt, but of course I knew the situation he would've been going into. He would've kind of been walking in my shoes or my shadow, I guess. He would've had to deal with that. There are so many opportunities out there for him. He made his own decision."

When the elder Ricketts came out of Franklin Regional High School, his final two choices were also Pitt and Penn State.

"I just think he wanted to do his own thing and I respect him for that," said Ricketts, the father. "I praise him and hope he does well. I think he picked a great school."

The younger Ricketts said he feels bad for his parents because he said they will probably take more ribbing about his decision than he will.

"But it will just be fun stuff from people," said Tom Ricketts, the father.

The younger Ricketts runs the 40-yard dash in 5.0 seconds and has room to put on more weight and muscle. He has added about 15 pounds since last season. He also is a good student with a 3.3 grade average.

While the decisions of Ricketts and Dieffenbach were blows to Pitt, Penn State now has commitments from five players in the WPIAL class of 2010. The others are Canon-McMillan linebacker Mike Hull, Sto-Rox quarterback Paul Jones and Penn-Trafford offensive lineman Luke Graham.

None of the five are considered among the top 25 players in the country. None are a Terrelle Pryor type. But they all had a number of Division I offers and have potential.

Pitt coach Dave Wannstedt said a few years ago that he wanted to build a fence around Western Pennsylvania and keep top recruits here. But there was no fence in the past, there is no fence now and there will be no fence in the future. Some years, Pitt gets more WPIAL players than other years. Things go go in cycles. Pitt certainly hasn't gotten all of the best WPIAL players in recent years, but Coach Dave Wannstedt have gotten their share of WPIAL players, including some who were offered by Penn State. Anyway, if you can win on the field, who cares where the players come from?

Some Pitt fans, though, are fretting Penn State getting five players from the 2010 WPIAL class - and Bradley recruited all five of them. Some Pitt fans are blaming assistant coach Greg Gattuso for not getting Ricketts. But he didn't recruit Ricketts. Assistant David Walker recruited Ricketts. Gattuso doesn't recruit all of Western Pennsylvania for Pitt. Only parts of it.  

There is always a chance some of the recruits could change their minds, especially if Pitt has a good season. But Ricketts said there is "no chance" he will change his mind. Dieffenbach pretty much said the same thing.

Things might not get better for Pitt in Western Pennsylvania in the near future, either. Some other top players from the WPIAL might go elsewhere. But the world is not ending for Pitt just because Pitt isn't getting WPIAL players. The days of Pitt living off the WPIAL are long gone. There just aren't enough top players in the WPIAL any more for Pitt to live off this area.

That said, it would certainly help Pitt if they get at least maybe half of the top players in the area. And losing ones with strong ties to Pitt hurts even more.

It is becoming more and more imperative that Wannstedt win on the field this season.

 


Posted Jun 03 2009, 09:21 PM by Mike White

Comments

rhcpfan wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 8:44 AM

Why is the fact that none of the PennState recruits are considered Top 25 in the country even mentioned?   Is this some sort of attempt to downplay the significance of these kids?  Well if you like #'s so much, how is this:

Diffenbach - 3rd ranked center in the country

Graham -      8th ranked guard in the country

Jones  -       3rd ranked QB in the country

Hull     -        2nd ranked MLB in the country

And these are just the WPIAL kids.  Take a look at Coxson the 2nd ranked WR in the country from Maryland.

Hate to break this to you, but PennState is cleaning up this year.  Must suck to be a Pitt fan.

BobSackamano wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 10:51 AM

This is great objective journalism.  

I also like the use of 'anyways' in the paragraph about Wanny's Wall.   Seriously Post-Gazette, I know we are entering the blog age, but how about a little quality control.

Fuzzy Dunlop wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 1:14 PM

The last seven paragraphs are beautiful, almost like Mr. White anticipates the calamity and uproar from Pitt fan (fans?) and is doing his best to calm their nerves.  Well done!

Also, when was the last time that Pitt got a top 25 recruit, much less a #1 like Derrick Williams?  Please stick to relevant details.  +1 to BobSack's quality comment.

collegesportsfan wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 3:00 PM

yesterday's article (not blog) about Dieffenbach listed him as Scout.com's No. 3 center.

Isn't it amazing the number of comments that always come from the school "that doesn't care about Pitt anymore"

Whistle Pig wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 3:13 PM

Not at all amazing! Rather, it's just so much fun tweaking the beaks of those birds who think Pitt's it!  

tweak tweak, tweetie!  ;-)

Whistle Pig wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 3:20 PM

And in the Ricketts & Diffenback family scenarios, these wise parents determined not to throw away potentially great futures after ...

;-)  

More seriously, their sound parental decisions not to interfere (and probably inform), enabled their offspring to see the light toward their own choices.

Wouldn't it be interesting to study just how many PSU and Pitt legacies (and crossovers) there have been over the past 4 or 5 decades?

Prbly not if one's a Pitt fan.  :-(

scott2212 wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 3:23 PM

Here are some pitt fans respones on the message boards

Tell us how the Big Ten sucks and PSU is overrated.  They OWN Western Pa again."

"This is bad. Something is going on that we don't know about or we have just lost all buzz with local recruits.  There is no candy coating losing a kid in our backyard that's dad works for the University and grew up a huge fan.  This can't play well with other recruits in the area trying to decide if Pitt is for them. I hate to be too negative but this one is scary"

"I have to agree.....something just isn't adding up here."

"I have been closely involved with recruiting since 1980 and seen many things in recruiting over the years.   This looks like an internal issue in the program."

"What isn't adding up?  5-6?  6-5?  5-7?  3-0?  The constant sniping at the Big East?  The program now in year 27 of not winning at least 10 games when even the dregs of the BCS conference manage this?  The half empty stadiums?  Hell, ESPN even chased the Big East off of their Thursday Night telecasts.

This program needs to win, win big.  And cheat.  At any cost, **** it, what is the worst thing that could happen?"

"Well maybe its actually true...We need a true breakthrough this year with a BE title and a BCS bid or we better find the next young Urban Meyer out there because without good recruites we know DW cant win."

"Being a Pitt football fan is one of the most miserable aspects of my life."

"Yep, this obviously confirms your suspicion.  The meddling AD is now screwing up recruiting.  Internal issue?  Yeah, it is called mediocrity.  Pitt fans maybe impressed with their 9 win season, but PSU is selling the Rose Bowl.  They are selling the Orange Bowl win of a couple of seasons ago.  We are selling the Sun Bowl, and if we can win 9 games next year, maybe Charlotte."

collegesportsfan wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 3:27 PM

Note that I am not a Pitt alum but would very much like all 3 area schools do well ....  as a college FB fan, I was in my glory back in the late 70s and early 80s

It is good to see PSU, after floundering in the 1st half of this decade, to be back among the elite of the B10.  ...   and PSU fans should also thank their lucky stars that they never have to face what will always be the big deterrent to Pitt's program .... playing in a pro city with a team so popular and successful as the Stillers.

Whistle Pig wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 3:36 PM

Indeed, the proximity in geography, legacy, and politically of these Pittsters who are driving to Happy Valley and elsewhere make these particular scenarios most intriguing.

It's tempting NOT to read into this rather  convictingly.

Seems something's simmering @ Pitt and those with the capacity and motivation to get the scoop, are apparently doing so.  And the short-term consequences are apparently painful.

But should anyone be really surprised?  40 years and all that changes in Panther football ... remains the same.

Fuzzy Dunlop wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 3:42 PM

Collegesportsfan,

How is playing in Pittsburgh - other than having to attend Pitt and live in Oakland, bleh - a disadvantage?  They share NFL caliber practice facilities with the Steelers.  The medical staff is superior by college standards.  And they play in a large, new and shiny stadium that many of their recruits have grown up dreaming of playing in (either in WPIAL championships, for Pitt or for the Steelers).  The problem is that they have not had a good coach for nearly thirty years.  That's it.  You win and the fans will come and so will some of the top recruits.  The Steelers are not preventing Pitt from succeeding.

collegesportsfan wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 3:57 PM

PSU gets 70,000+ for its spring scrimmage;  USC gets 15,000.

Miami (the U) in the late 90s and early this decade only sold out vs FSU .. at a time when they were THE best in NCAA, and even that program has dropped despite having the best recruiting base around!

Pitt gets less media attention and fan reaction than the Stillers, Pens and even the Pirates.  Go up near Happy Valley,down to Morgantown, or across to Columbus ... and the dominant conversation all year long on the streets, on the radio and in the press is the  localfb team ....  I know,Ihave lived in State College for 3 years, Morgantown for 6 years, and  Massilon and Akron for a combined 7 years.    Here they talk about the Stillers all year around, and the Pens when they don't talk about the Stillers.

I can write several more paragraphs about the disadvantges of playing in a pro town ... believe me.

collegesportsfan wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 4:07 PM

and a couple of more things .....   I know more than a ew Pitt alums who are Pitt fans, but if given the choice of either Pitt or Stiller tickets, they would jump for the Sunday game.

I would take the likes of Beaver Stadium, the Horseshoe, or the Big House over Heinz Field any day .... the only attractive thing about Heinz is that the Steelers play there.

Lastly,  Pitt cannot afford or attract a major caliber coach ...they just don't bring in the income that the teams with the 100,000 seats and major TV and bowl contracts do

Fuzzy Dunlop wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 4:10 PM

First of all, USC is not in a pro town, so I'm not sure what your point is there.

Second, fan interest or obsession is nice, but do you think that Indiana or Kentucky - both in relatively isolated locales - enjoy the same level of support as PSU, WVU, Nebraska, Florida St., Georgia, etc.  Not at all, because they do not win.

Furthermore, Michigan is just down the road from Detroit which has, I believe, an NFL team, an NHL team and pro baseball team and even NBA basketball; yet somehow Michigan has enjoyed virtually unabated success in college football while Pitt flounders.  Amazing!

Win and greater, long-term success might come.  Lose and constantly run through retread coaches and hacks, and it most certainly will not.  I don't disagree that PSU, WVU and OSU get more local love, but that has nothing to do with winning.  Did it stop UMiami or USC, you know two of your examples of teams that get little local fan support, from succeeding?

Whistle Pig wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 4:21 PM

Most definitely there are urban/non-urban dynamics @ play here.

And in it's purest refinements, it says ...Pitt's a great basketball program because it's in Oakland/Pgh.  And Penn State's a great football tradition because it's in suburban Bellefonte.  

And the city enables packing the house in hoops and papering the stadium in football just so the TV won't have to pan a completely empty stadium.

And the cows on College Ave enable Sat football crowds of 110K when they play Coastal Carolina and disable B.Jordan Arena from getting more than Rec Hall.

So ...how do Kentucky and Chapel Hill get basketball crowds?  Make it Syracuse and the Carrier Dome?

And how do UW, USC, UCLA, Arizona State,  Central Florida, and a whole bunch more fill Heinz Field sized stadiums in football.

Yes, conventional wisdom and history suggest that being in Oakland is a more complex pigskin sale than 7 or 8 dates in Happy Valley.  And yes, conventional wisdom and history suggest that being in State College on a wintery  Wednesday night makes for a tougher roundball sellout than it would in Oakland.

But the key is putting out a good product in both.  And as history shows in both scenarios, in those all-too-rare times when they happen, people show up.

But it's way too simplistic to lay Pitt's football problems on location.  And it's way too simplistic to lay Penn State's basketball woes on location.  

Both are simply cop outs.

collegesportsfan wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 4:27 PM

from 1976 thru 1982, Pitt had as good as a FB program as anyone else.  They won 1 Natl Chapionship, finsihed 2nd twice in the polls, and finished in te Top 10 every year (Look it up).    Yet, despite all that winning, the only sell-outs Pitt had in those years are when they played PSU, WVU or ND ... and Pitt stadium only held 53,000!

And when the Rams were in LA, USC or UCLA rarely sold out ....only when they played each other or when USC played ND.  

College teams traditionally do not do well in pro and major cities  .... there are too many diversions

Fuzzy Dunlop wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 5:35 PM

Right, but didn't the coaching carousel also begin around the end of, if not during, that run?  Seven seasons is a nice run, but it's not sustained excellence.  Further, you have not really addressed the issue of why attendance even matters.  You said yourself that UMiami barely has sellouts, yet they have competed for titles for 25+ years.  USC might sell out, but they clearly don't enjoy Texas or LSU type support.  How do they do it?  Good coaching and a reputation for producing pros.  Pitt kind of has the latter, but has not had the former for a looooooong time.

BobSackamano wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 5:57 PM

Pitt has what, 5 or 6 - 10 win seasons - EVER.  

This is a problem of expectations, don't blame the Steelers.  Be happy with your 6-8 wins every year and deal with it. There is no reason to believe that next year is the year.  

History says you have a 5 in 100 chance of winning 10 games.  Why would a recruit want to go there, even if you do play in front of 30,000 yellow seats each weekend?

collegesportsfan wrote re: Ricketts and father talk about Penn State commitment
on Thu, Jun 4 2009 7:35 PM

Fuzzy,  This is easy ...  Miami did so well, and will do again, because Florida is easily one of the most fertile recruiting grounds for high school fb players.  Back in the 70s, Western PA was probably the most fertile -- not only did Pitt get its share, so did PSU, ND, Michigan and many others.   (Montana, Dorsett, Marino, Bruce Clark, Fralic, Covert, Grimm, Holloway, Collins, Sweeney, Ham, Ron & Rich Saul, Hanratty, ... and I'm just scratching the surface)

Now, Pitt gets as many, if not more, good players from FL than W PA (and these were paased over by FL, Miami & FSU ...   A.Bryant, Sessions, Blades, Cox, Romeus, Sheard, Mustkas, G Williams)