By Dejan Kovacevic | 11 a.m. Tuesday

Click here to submit question.
We have Qs ...
__________
Q: Hi, Dejan. I read your column everyday and think you're doing a great job. I am a diehard Pirates fan and am very frustrated that they keep developing some stars and then trade them away. My question is: Will they ever try to keep them?
Also why don't they go more aggressively after some quality free agents?
I think Rocco Baldelli would be a great signing. So why don't they just quit messing around and sign him before they lose out on him? I'm getting kind of tired reading that they are interested in all these players and then they lose out on them.
John Sacco from Washington
KOVACEVIC: Taking your Baldelli question first, John, I have no reason to think the Pirates are "messing around" in terms of signing him. The Baldelli side has been completely quiet on this matter, so getting a sense for the talks has been pretty difficult. Check the Morning Links for some stuff Cincinnati GM Walt Jocketty had to say about it.
As for getting tired of reading about free-agent pursuits that do not pan out, consider the alternative: You could hear nothing at all about those pursuits, then really wonder if the Pirates are not simply messing around.
To your initial point, we will not know if the Pirates will try to keep proven star-level talent in Pittsburgh until it actually happens. There have been promises, but such things are best determined by the proof. To date, new management's only commitment in this direction was the long-term contract signed by Freddy Sanchez.
__________
Q: Hi, Dejan. I have been wondering why there has been little mention of an extension for Adam LaRoche this offseason?
I can't imagine the Bucs intend to let him walk away for nothing at the end of 2009. With pending free agency, his trade value would be quite low during the season. It seems the Bucs have to at least give him a two-year deal to increase his market value or try and sign him long-term.
Is there any perception that he may take a discount based on his brother being in town?
John Alcorn of Glenshaw
KOVACEVIC: Actually, John, I have made no mention at all of an extension for LaRoche, if only because it never has come across anyone's lips inside or outside the organization. And there is ample cause for that: The team and player had a brief flirtation with such a concept early last year and, by all accounts, it went very poorly. The team thought LaRoche's price way high, and LaRoche's side was taken aback by the team's reaction.
Maybe more than anyone on the roster, LaRoche's future with the franchise is difficult to peg. The Pirates are desperate for power, and there is no one on the horizon ready to replace what he supplies, even if it comes in the final three or four months. But they also hardly seem eager to lock in LaRoche, given those traditional first-half struggles.
Would LaRoche want to stay?
That one I can answer definitively, based on many conversations with him on this topic: Yes. And this was before his brother came along.
__________
Q: I like the comments that Jack Wilson and now Ian Snell have made about wanting to get better now rather than later. But, if they are already unhappy in January, what does this mean for the clubhouse in the summer, when they are 10 or 15 games out?
To me this is another bad omen this team could lose 100 games with relative ease. As bad as the past dozen teams have been, I don't remember reality setting in this early.
Nate Mattern of Bethel Park
KOVACEVIC: There was not nearly as much feedback about Snell's remarks as those of Wilson, no doubt because they were not nearly as strong. What did arrive was mostly -- though not entirely -- supportive of what Snell said.
As for the clubhouse ...
I write this time and again, but it never is too much: A clubhouse environment is important. It is. No one should dispute that. Even with a mostly young team, it helps to have someone in place -- maybe even a young player -- to help create a scene in which players feel pushed, feel accountable.
But it is not even a fraction the factor that talent is. Or performance.
If there are valid questions to be asked about Wilson or Snell, it is whether either of them will give to the 2009 Pirates on the field what they gave to the 2007 edition or to the one from this past season. If Wilson hits around his career mark, plays golden defense and stays healthy, that will mean much more than anything he says, now or during the summer. If Snell pitches the way he has at his peak, the same will apply.
Let those be your omens, Nate. These Pirates do not appear to be a contender, except in the rosiest -- and perhaps most unreasonable -- outlooks. And the reason for that is a lack of talent.
Posted
Jan 06 2009, 11:00 AM
by
Dejan Kovacevic