By Dejan Kovacevic | 5:38 p.m. Wednesday
The one down below looks to be getting overwhelmed with comments, which will make it tough to load. So reload up here.
I will put updates here, too, but I can tell you now that actual reporting has taken up almost all of my time and probably will continue to do so through the evening.
What there is right now: The union has filed a grievance against the commissioner's office regarding the Pirates' signing of Pedro Alvarez, which that body feels occurred after the midnight deadline. The team's position is that it happened in a "timely" manner and was approved by the commissioner's office.
The earliest possible arbitration date is Sept. 10, and Shyam Das will be the arbiter.
5:49 p.m.: To a couple technical issues: No money has exchanged hands because no hard contract was signed, as has been clear all along. That was going to happen with the physical, which has not taken place. There was a verbal agreement, as was reported at the time. It remains to be seen how that is interpreted given these unusual circumstances.
UPDATE 7:10 p.m.: Scott Boras phoned from California to give this quote: "The Pirates violated Major League Baseball rules and have issued a nearly 600-word statement, made their actions look to be my fault. I think it's time for the Pirates and Mr. Coonelly to come clean with the fans of Pittsburgh and let everyone know about their dealings with Mr. Alvarez."
7:35 p.m.: Pat Courtney, vice president of communications, put out this release on behalf of Major League Baseball: "We believe the grievance is entirely without merit. The deadline was extended to accept minor league contracts voluntarily entered into by the clubs and the players with the help of their agents. It is settled law that the arbitration panel has no authority to disturb such minor league contracts."
9:21 p.m.: OK, here are a couple other things, but first I want to clarify something from above: The reason I was unable to post anything more than the most pertinent updates here has been that my first master is the newspaper, and the deadlines there make for certain restrictions. I had to make many contacts to get as much information for the main piece as possible, and time was ticking there -- deadline or not -- because people are not always reachable at night.
Anyway, here is point one: This $200,000 figure I keep seeing in the comments has no basis in fact. The Pirates and the other party have not come anywhere close to discussing money and surely will not until after the arbitrator rules. Think about it from each side: The Pirates would have zero interest in such a conversation because they think they can win this. And Boras has no leverage at the moment to ask. If he were to get what he wants right on the spot, he still could not call off the union grievance. To repeat, the grievance was not filed by Alvarez or Boras, and it is not aimed at the Pirates. It is at the commissioner's office on a procedural matter.
Another point: The idea that the arbitrator will just discard the verbal agreement comes with no precedent. None. Arbitrators live and breathe off precedent.
11:02 p.m.: Main story will be up on the site within an hour.
Posted
Aug 27 2008, 05:38 PM
by
Dejan Kovacevic