
By Dejan Kovacevic | 9:45 p.m. Friday
I will be up for quite a while, if anyone wants to engage in an impromptu Q&A session.
As always, click here to submit your question. I will put up the first few I get.
UPDATE 11:13 p.m. Honestly, the inbox is getting blown away, so I took the Qs I am going to use for the night. Instead, if you want to comment further, the comment space here is unlimited -- as we are testing tonight -- and all you have to do is register at this link. Pain-free and spam-free. Promise.
__________
Q: Simple question, Dejan: Do you think this was a good deal? And do you think this is about as good as the Pirates could have expected?
Bennett Aikin of Mt. Lebanon
KOVACEVIC: What is certain to this point, Bennett, is that this trade is overwhelmingly - though not universally - unpopular. People who are angry are really angry, as you will see below.
That is to be expected with any trade that sends veterans playing at their peak in one direction, four unproven, unknown prospects in return.
But this is different: The Pirates had said they were seeking high-end talent, and only Jose Tabata appears to fit that mold, and he comes with significant questions about his hand, his hamstring and, yes, the uncertainty that comes with his age. But at least he has high-end potential. The same cannot be said right now for the other three, with the possible exception of George Kontos because of his power fastball.
There is no question that, at this stage, the return appears to be a disappointment. That could change over time, obviously, but we are not doing a 2011 Q&A. We are doing one for today.
__________
Q: Dejan, with a week to go before the deadline, hard to believe this was the best deal on the table. Billy Beane got comparable value for a starting pitcher with an ERA of nearly 5.00 a week ago. We just traded a guy who will instantly have the highest batting average in the American League and one of the best setup men in the game.
Rumor was that Neal had been asking too much. What happened to cause him to go so far in the other direction?
Shawn Moran of Charleston, W.Va.
KOVACEVIC: The timing of the deal, without having had much chance to delve into background yet, would suggest that there was not much else out there. I had heard Tampa Bay was very interested two weeks ago, then got wind that it had faded some in the past few days. Others were in there.
But yeah, when compared to either of Beane's Joe Blanton deal, this is left wanting.
__________
Q: Well, Dejan, I hope you enjoyed your "day off."
I've seen that Ross Ohlendorf has started in the minors, but the Yankees have put him in the bullpen. Assuming he's the closest to the majors, will the Pirates switch him back to starting?
Jeff Tatusko of Arnold
KOVACEVIC: Paul Meyer remains on the coverage. I just jumped on the blog as soon as I got a text revealing the trade, and I still have not left.
The Pirates are being quiet until physicals, but yes, the pattern is that Ohlendorf will be a starter by default.
__________
Q: Dejan, as I type, "Baseball Tonight" is reporting that GMs around the league are saying the PBC got hosed and that the Yankees gave up nothing to get the best two trade pieces we had. Is this a joke? After having hope for the new regime, this trade is awfully Littlefield-esque.
Daniel Cronrath of Jacksonville, Fla.
KOVACEVIC: I doubt that, even with ESPN's massive resources, a fair canvassing of GMs was done. But then, I did not hear the comment you cite to know the context.
I can say that I got a text within 30 minutes of the deal that just said, "Wow." And not in a good way.
__________
Q: Hi, Dejan. Overall, I don't think this is a bad trade despite some of the comments on the blog. Lack of pitching depth is clearly the major problem in this organization. This trade yielded three quality arms with major league potential. Hard to argue with that. They also get what looks like a younger version of Andrew McCutchen.
I give the trade a B. What is your take?
Sean Epstein of Squirrel Hill, Pittsburgh
KOVACEVIC: Doug Mientkiewicz called Jose Tabata, the prime prospect in the trade, a "mini Manny Ramirez" based on his brief time with the Yankees, and there certainly are people who like him. He might well end up defining this trade.
But New York also had a superior outfield prospect in Austin Jackson and superior pitching prospects. Which would indicate that the Pirates, despite packaging - yes, packaging (not tonight, please) - two very good players, went for quantity over quality. And that would seem to run counter to their stated desire to aim for high-end talent.
__________
Q: Hey, DK, one thing really bothers me: I just feel like Neal Huntington blinked way too early. It's a week before the trade deadline, why make this trade now and not wait a week to see what other teams will offer? Why not pressure the Yankees into giving up Austin Jackson or Ian Kennedy instead of what they gave up?
Sadly, I think this trade will hurt our credibility with other GMs who hear that we're asking for the moon and then accept far less.
Marc Graham of Mount Washington, Pittsburgh
KOVACEVIC: Credibility in trades is not gained or lost on the day of the deal, especially when it involves prospects. If the prospects pan out better than expected, Brian Cashman will look bad.
But, to your point, the timing question is a good one, and one I surely will pose to Neal Huntington once he is free to discuss this.
__________
Q: Dejan, I've tried to be much more optimistic about the Pirates this year. I've even followed your advice that it's not fair to judge Neal Huntington based on Dave Littlefield's actions.
But this is classic Littlefield. Sorry. Ask for elite players, then accept a care package.
The last time I felt this pessimistic about the Pirates was when they drafted Danny Moskos.
It also makes Huntington 0 for 2 in trades. The Salomon Torres give-away just irritates me every night when I watch ESPN.
What's the rationale? And wouldn't the offers have gotten better if Huntington had waited a week?
Raymond Ankney of Birmingham, Ala.
KOVACEVIC: They might have, Raymond. Much to find out.
__________
Q: Feeling prophetic after your July 18 blog post, Dejan?
Jason Fredericks of Pittsburgh
KOVACEVIC: I can see where the public's reaction very much takes on that feel. Here comes poor, pitiful Pittsburgh coming to the rescue of a Yankees team they just beat in two out of three. Take our good players. We don't deserve them.
I get it. Believe me. I'm born and raised here. I get it.
__________
Q: Dejan, I am furious about this trade and 15 years (soon to be 16) of losing. Do you think this salary dump trade will be used to NOT sign Pedro Alvarez, e.g. pay off more debt?
David Dinger of Brookville
KOVACEVIC: If the Pirates are serious about adding high-end talent, as opposed to mere depth, one excellent way to go about that, by all accounts, would be to sign Pedro Alvarez.
I have written this for years, and it remains true tonight with so much salary going out the door: The money is there.
__________
Q: Why should I bother even following this team after a trade like this? They traded two of their best chips for B level prospects at best. What happened to the blue-chip prospects they have been asking for?
Why does it feel like this ship has been sinking for the last fifteen years without the bottom ever being in sight?
Michael Mitrovich of Sewickley
KOVACEVIC: It will only get darker, Michael. Those were two big pieces that went out the door, four big question marks about to walk through it.
__________
More tomorrow ...
Posted
Jul 25 2008, 09:48 PM
by
Dejan Kovacevic