A Fine Point

Authors

The editors who craft the Post-Gazette’s daily stands on the issues affecting the region, the state and the nation hold an on-line conversation with readers about key topics in the news. The PG editorial writers are: Tom Waseleski, Reg Henry, Susan Mannella, Tony Norman and Dan Simpson.  

 Register to comment
Guide to commenting

Syndication

Gun lust

Tom Waseleski

There are many facets to the tragedy engulfing Jordan Brown, the 11-year-old from Lawrence County who is charged with using his own shotgun to kill his father's pregnant girlfriend, Kenzie Marie Houk. The part that should concern Pennsylvanians -- once again -- is the state's lack of sensible gun restrictions. I know what you're thinking: Here comes another one of those anti-gun screeds. Actually not.

If you take a look at Jerome Sherman's excellent news story in Sunday's PG, you'll see how Pennsylvania law is practically silent on when a child may pick up and fire a gun. Although a person can't buy a handgun under age 21 or a rifle under age 18 and can't obtain a hunting license under the age of 12, a child can go hunting and fire a gun with a parent at any age. While the law says a minor must be under the supervision of a parent and be engaged in lawful activity when possessing a gun, does that mean a parent who gives a child standing permission to keep a shotgun nearby -- in his room, in his toy box or elsewhere -- is acting within the law?

Also, and most clearly a factor in the Jordan Brown case, there is no state law that requires guns and/or ammunition to be locked away from children. Why?

Because even though none of these sensible restrictions would infringe on gun ownership, gun use or hunting, the gun lobby -- which has the Pennsylvania Legislature in a stranglehold -- cannot tolerate the kind of modest laws that might have prevented the Jordan Brown and Kenzie Marie Houk tragedy from happening.


Posted Mar 02 2009, 11:21 AM by Tom Waseleski