A Fine Point

Authors

The editors who craft the Post-Gazette’s daily stands on the issues affecting the region, the state and the nation hold an on-line conversation with readers about key topics in the news. The PG editorial writers are: Tom Waseleski, Reg Henry, Susan Mannella, Tony Norman and Dan Simpson.  

 Register to comment
Guide to commenting

Syndication

The Willy-Wonk(y) President

 Tony Norman

There's no denying that our president is a little on the wonky side. Correction: President Obama is a lot on the wonky side. If his first primetime press conference last night is any indication of how he intends to talk to the American people about the issues of the day, then we're going to have to bring our "A-game" just to listen to the guy. There's different kinds of wonky when it comes to Democrats. Bill Clinton was wonky, but in an aw-shucks kinda' way. He would throw in an analogy about a pig in the middle of one of his superb explanations just to remind you that he always had his mind on what the Republicans were doing. Hillary Clinton has a wonky side that feels more like rote memorization because of her flat delivery, though there is little doubt that she has mastered everything that comes out of her mouth. John Edwards was wonky about poverty and healthcare, but in a "come up to my apartment so I can show you some of my art prints" kind of way. President Obama brings a moral imperative to his wonkiness. He's a cool character who knows how to stay on message, think on his feet, sift through data, answer questions on multiple levels, make distinctions, embrace nuance and remind you in an oh, so subtle way that if he isn't the smartest guy in the room, then the smartest guy in the room is working for him.

I thought Barack Obama's first press conference as President was a masterful performance, but not necessarily one for the ages. It was sort of like his Inauguration speech -- it did what it had to do. It showed that he deserved to be there and that he could afford to be as tedious as he needed to be because the times are serious and that the time for entertaining the Washington press corps is over. He came before the press and the American people last night with one mission: sell the Stimulus Package. Yes, his answers about the economy's dire straits were repetitive to a point, but he obviously figures that it may be necessary to belabor the obvious when Republicans are arguing in some quarters that a more "sensible stimulus package" would consist of 60 percent tax cuts and maybe 40 percent spending on infrastructure and job creation.

Earlier in the day, I re-watched Oliver Stone's "W," so maybe Mr. Obama benefited from the contrast. Josh Brolin perfectly embodies George W. Bush's lack of intellectual heft, especially during press conferences where he was reduced to repeating nonsensical bromides, catch phrases and cliches in an attempt to mollify the anxieties of the American people. Barack Obama is taking us in another direction. He's not given to the comfortable, pithy soundbite for the evening news and cable networks. I think he considers the willingness to go along with that a distortion of our politics. He's shockingly old school in his belief that Americans can follow his logic and way of thinking from premise to conclusion. As MSNBC's Chris Matthews commented in his analysis after the press conference, it is a marvelous thing to observe how a president's mind works.

In other words, a wonky, way too loquacious president is a nice problem to have after eight years of taciturn b.s., fake populism and anti-intellectualism as a Washington-sanctioned art form. 

 

   


Posted Feb 10 2009, 11:21 AM by Tony Norman

Comments

Reg Henry wrote re: The Willy-Wonk(y) President
on Tue, Feb 10 2009 1:44 PM

I missed the introduction to Obama's press conference last night but I did catch most of the questions. I thought he was knowledgeable, articulate, blessedly swagger-free and high-minded enough not to attack those Republicans determined to put country last at all costs. (Not that the stimulus package is perfect but a spirit of compromise across the aisle might have improved it.)

Oh, and I also thought that his appearance was tedious - which it pains me to say. My problem was with style, not so much with substance. To a possible charge of caring more about the theater of the moment, I would say that any prime time appearance on television requires a certain amount of entertainment value to be successful in engaging the American people, which, after all, is the whole point. The bully pulpit is either bully or it's boring, and last night I reckon it was mostly boring for all but political junkies.

I understand why Obama wanted to have a news conference in prime time but he would have been better served to have made a simple speech, succinct and memorable. Because reporters have to fill the "holes" in their stories (those parts of a story that naturally suggest other questions), they often have to ask the same question in different ways. This dull business should have been conducted in working hours.

As it happened, Obama was not much help with his answers, which tended to be repetitive and long-winded. Where were the short, sharp, snappy retorts? Apparently he has been hanging out too much with Joe Biden, vice president and noted windbag.

Still, we have gone from a president who didn't have an original thought in his head to one who is too thoughtful to get immediately to the point. This is progress and I suppose it is churlish to complain.

Susan Mannella wrote re: The Willy-Wonk(y) President
on Tue, Feb 10 2009 2:07 PM

Not to sound tedious and repetitious . . . oh wait, that was last night.

Yes, it is great to have a president who is thinking and talking at the same time. But, like Reg, I found President Obama’s prime time press conference too long on the details, with the same ground covered again and again.

To test whether my memory was in line with the facts, I took a look at a transcript of the press conference, which confirmed my impression. The president’s introductory remarks number 1,200 words (exactly, which is kind of odd). Fine. A perfectly reasonable length to summary important public policy, give examples, make a strong argument for the economic stimulus bill. And Mr. Obama did that.

But then came the first question, naturally about the stimulus bill. His answer was 898 words long but, in all those words, very little new information was conveyed.

The president took a third run at the topic during the third question of the news conference, and that time he exceeded his intro. Yes, a fully 1,218 words. True, in that speech — let’s call it what it was — he gave a lot more concrete examples about how the IT industry can help our health care system, our schools, etc. But it was too long.

Like it or not, television is a marvelous device that a president can use to bring his arguments directly to the citizenry. I’m glad that President Obama wants to talk to all of us. And I’m not looking for a president who only talks in sound bites.

But he needs to work on answering questions from reporters in a more succinct way that elaborates on his message rather than just repeats it.

Dave@OMT wrote re: The Willy-Wonk(y) President
on Wed, Feb 11 2009 4:30 PM

"Too long on details" ... "tedious" ... "boring" ...

C'mon, guys, do I have to remind you that we're just now coming out of eight years of suffering through the administration of President Shemp Howard?  And that, thanks to President Shemp, this country and its institutions are getting sucked down the pipe faster than in a Drano commercial?

I happen to think that it is not only refreshing but downright reassuring that we at long last have a President who is smart, tough, articulate, compassionate, and yes, maybe just a little boring and repetitive when it comes to trying to explain to the rest of us just how screwed up things are and what it's going to take to set things right.  Give me tedium over stupidity any day of the week. George Bush was the master of succinct answers, and look where that's landed us.

Let's count our blessings; it might well have been John McCain cracking on TV the other night, cracking jokes and keeping the press corps in stitches ... which would likely have been less "tedious", but infinitely more of a shame.

Tony's right.  With all the other problems facing America right now, a "loquacious" President is definitely not one of them.