A Fine Point

Authors

The editors who craft the Post-Gazette’s daily stands on the issues affecting the region, the state and the nation hold an on-line conversation with readers about key topics in the news. The PG editorial writers are: Tom Waseleski, Reg Henry, Susan Mannella, Tony Norman and Dan Simpson.  

 Register to comment
Guide to commenting

Syndication

Dressing Sarah Palin

Susan Mannella

I am not the least bit surprised that it cost $150,000 to dress Gov. Palin up for multiple campaign stops Sarah Palin on Oct. 4each.

Like it or not, a woman on the campaign trail can't dress the same every day, as the male candidates can. Barack Obama, John McCain and Joe Biden probably could wear the same suit every day if they chose to do that and, as long as they had it freshly pressed and changed their ties, nobody would notice.

Not so for Ms. Palin. The Republican throngs who greet her at campaign stops each day expect her to be well-dressed. Heck, plenty of them are paying $25,000 for the privilege of having their photographs taken with Ms. Palin. She better not show up in sweat pants and a fleece jacket looking like she's headed down to watch the rink rats practice their slap shots.

If the Republican National Committee wants to spend its money to dress up Sarah Palin so she looks good on the national stage, I don't have a problem with that.

The argument is that she's being hypocritical because she paints herself as the common woman, just one of the regular folks, but then spends $150,000 on clothing. That certainly is way out of line with the clothing budget for most American women, but a more fair comparison might be putting Ms. Palin's clothing budget up against a Hollywood celebrity. You can be sure the $150,000 price tag is chump change by comparison.

 For a smarter take on the whole fashion slap, take a look at what Robin Givhan of the Washington Post said this morning.


Posted Oct 23 2008, 12:14 PM by Susan Mannella
Filed under:

Comments

Dave@OMT wrote re: Dressing Sarah Palin
on Thu, Oct 23 2008 2:20 PM

Nonsense.  Comparing Sarah Palin's clothing budget with a Hollywood star is anything but a fair comparison.  Even Palin herself would object to your lumping her in with those unpatriotic, leftist Hollywood elites.

A more fair comparison would be Michelle Obama, who's out on the campaign trail every day, just like Palin.  In a recent interview, Michelle was talking about her $30 dress that she bought at the Gap (and her youngest chimed in with, "Mommy buys EVERYTHING at the Gap").  Michelle knows a thing or two about how to present herself ... she always looks great and you can tell she's not breaking the Obama bank account on her clothes.  We're talking low-maintenance, serious babe here.

Contrast this with Palin's $2,500 Valentino jacket, and her new $400 glasses.  Oh, and the $4,716.49 she spent on hair and makeup in September.  Talk about high maintenance.  It's all a far cry from that photo of her circulating on the Internet that was taken in an Anchorage supermarket back in July before she was thrust into the limelight.

And let's not forget about Cindy McCain, one of whose ensembles at the Republican Convention reportedly cost $313,000, almost twice as much as Palin spent on her entire wardrobe update.  

Of course, Cindy's got the big bucks.  She's not even in the same class as her husband, let alone the Palins.  I can just imagine Cindy inviting the Palins over to one of their 14 or 15 homes for a soiree.  That's a dinner party I'd pay to see.

I don't understand why legions of working class people seem to think they're in the same league with this Republican crowd.  It's irony bordering on satire that they have the nerve to portray the Obamas as "elitist".

Deborah wrote re: Dressing Sarah Palin
on Thu, Oct 23 2008 4:22 PM

The RNC bought and paid for the clothing for Governor Palin. Merchants and employees benefitted, too.  That's what I call "spreading the wealth"!

Dave@OMT wrote re: Dressing Sarah Palin
on Thu, Oct 23 2008 9:34 PM

Yes, Deborah, we're sure that the clerk who sold Sarah that $2,500 Valentino jacket can take that cruise to Aruba now.

Toadsly wrote re: Dressing Sarah Palin
on Thu, Oct 23 2008 11:05 PM

I support Obama, but that isn't stopping me from being mesmerized by Sarah Palin.

Not since "Romantic Love" destroyed the medieval concept of "Courtly Love" have so many modern-day paladins admired from afar the unapproachable and perfect object of their pure affections: Legions of contemporary Dante Alighieris and one Beatrice Pontinari.

Toadsly, being so smitten, will not begrudge me lady any indulgence -- at any price.

cvh1787 wrote re: Dressing Sarah Palin
on Thu, Oct 30 2008 2:59 PM

I don't know what universe you live in, Susan Manella, but I could live comfortably for three years on $150,000.

In the context of the current economic downturn, with stock market losses affecting a lot of people, including my family, and with others losing their houses or jobs, this kind of extravagance seems obscene.

It does, however, expose how the Republican Party "plays" the American people: pretending to represent the "real America" while promoting the economic interests of oil companies, multinational corporations that ship jobs oversees, and hereditary multimillionaires like John McCain's wife. They're the ones who get the tax breaks. At the same time the Republicans jeer at the "elites" who, like Barack Obama, have risen to prominence by talent, effort, and higher education.

White Southerners have fallen for this nonsense for a century. It's sad to see that the rest of the country can also be swindled and duped into believing that McCain cares about plumbers, when he's surely never met the plumbers who work in one of his seven houses.  

cvh1787 wrote re: Dressing Sarah Palin
on Thu, Oct 30 2008 2:59 PM

I don't know what universe you live in, Susan Manella, but I could live comfortably for three years on $150,000.

In the context of the current economic downturn, with stock market losses affecting a lot of people, including my family, and with others losing their houses or jobs, this kind of extravagance seems obscene.

It does, however, expose how the Republican Party "plays" the American people: pretending to represent the "real America" while promoting the economic interests of oil companies, multinational corporations that ship jobs oversees, and hereditary multimillionaires like John McCain's wife. They're the ones who get the tax breaks. At the same time the Republicans jeer at the "elites" who, like Barack Obama, have risen to prominence by talent, effort, and higher education.

White Southerners have fallen for this nonsense for a century. It's sad to see that the rest of the country can also be swindled and duped into believing that McCain cares about plumbers, when he's surely never met the plumbers who work in one of his seven houses.  

dani wrote re: Dressing Sarah Palin
on Thu, Oct 30 2008 6:37 PM

Michelle Obama was on Leno in a J Crew outfit that was beautiful. She looked comfortable and classy.

I think people who spout "elitist" should watch what she wears.