A Fine Point

Authors

The editors who craft the Post-Gazette’s daily stands on the issues affecting the region, the state and the nation hold an on-line conversation with readers about key topics in the news. The PG editorial writers are: Tom Waseleski, Reg Henry, Susan Mannella, Tony Norman and Dan Simpson.  

 Register to comment
Guide to commenting

Syndication

Debating the Palin-Biden debate

Susan Mannella

I don't know what the topic of conversation is in other workplaces this morning - maybe it's the victorious Pitt Panthers or the fact that it finally feels like Fall. But get a group of editorial writers together and the topic always is the latest news, and today that's the performance of Sarah Palin and Joe Biden in last night's vice-presidential debate.

Republicans are bound to be happy about the Alaska governor who showed up last night. Gone were the deer-in-the-headlights reactions Gov. Palin exhibited during televised interviews with ABC's Charles Gibson and CBS's Katie Couric.

Anyone who thinks Gov. Palin has been picked on unfairly probably saw that view being reinforced by her answers and demeanor in the debate. But she didn't deliver, if the goal was to convince anyone who was on the fence. She developed decent arguments on several key topics, but it was pretty obvious that, when questions veered away from those, Gov. Palin wasn't going with them.

Sen. Biden gave a more-than-solid performance. He brought an obvious depth of knowledge and looked like somebody who is not only ready to be vice president but also someone who could move into the Oval Office if he had to do it.

And that's really the trouble with Gov. Palin.

Can you really picture her sitting behind that fabled desk and looking as though she belongs?

Here's what The New York Times said in an editorial this morning. For a completely different take, here's one from the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

In addition to being open for your comments here at A Fine Point, the PG is running a poll asking whether the debate will influence your vote, and a forum, where you can expound on your opinion of the debate. Or just do it here, and we'll try to get back to you.


Posted Oct 03 2008, 11:35 AM by Susan Mannella
Filed under: , ,

Comments

usacitizen wrote re: Debating the Palin-Biden debate
on Fri, Oct 3 2008 12:42 PM

I HOPE PA WILL RECALL THAT OBAMA IS THE ONE WHO THOUGHT PA CITIZENS WERE CLINGING TO GUNS AND RELEGION.... AND BIDEN CHOSE TO RUN WITH THIS GUY. JOE ARE YOU SURE? AMERICA SHOULD COME BEFORE PARTY.

SHAME ON ALL AMERICANS WHO ARE BASHING PALIN BECAUSE SHE IS A WOMAN....YOU DID IT TO HILLARY TOO.

WOULD TRUE AMERICANS VOTE FOR A FAR LEFTY FOR PRESIDENT, WHO SURROUNDS HIMSELF WITH PEOPLE WHO SPEW HATRED OF AMERICA BUT WOULD NOT VOTE FOR A QUALIFIED PATRIOT JUST BECAUSE OF GENDER. YOU PEOPLE WILL WILT THE YELLOW  ROSE!

gordonbombay wrote re: Debating the Palin-Biden debate
on Fri, Oct 3 2008 1:35 PM

It's a shame the commenter above is allowed to vote.

twice-bit wrote re: Debating the Palin-Biden debate
on Fri, Oct 3 2008 4:18 PM

It seems to me that Palin paved the way for everyone's Civil Union laws.  She opposes gay-marriage only to the extent of refusing to use the name.  If she's going to stay as the darling of Fundamentalists, I don't see how they argue against her rational position -- which Joe Biden had already provided the Constitutional justification for.

Joe Biden gave a dramatic exposition about what he has changed

since the start of his career, "I don't question the motive of my

opponents."   John McCain has not yet learned that lesson, it seems to me.