Timothy McNulty | August 11, 2009
There is a Jack Murtha angle to all the stories lately (many of them at the WSJ) about Congress taking advantage of free air travel and government jets. Murtha has tried for years to get new Air Force planes for Congress, a columnist at CQ says:
"If at first you don't succeed ... wait two decades for a new Congress, and then try again."
If that credo isn't matted, framed, and hanging on the office wall of Rep. John P. Murtha, it should be.
On July 22, Murtha's Defense Appropriations Subcommittee reported out
a $636 billion appropriations bill that included funding for new
airplanes in which the Air Force could ferry Members of Congress around
the world.
The eight new airplanes in the bill were precisely twice as many as
the Obama Administration had requested -- but, for some reason, the
price tag had more than doubled, from $220 million for the requested
four planes to $550 million for eight. I guess that's what passes for
mathematics in Washington these days.
Facing a buzz-saw of opposition over the weekend, however, it appears that the Air Force will not be getting that funding
after all, and lawmakers on junkets -- scratch that, insert "fact
finding missions" -- will have to make do with their current jets.
What's more interesting about the episode is that it's not the first
time Murtha has tried to upgrade his air travel -- and been shot down.
The November 27, 1989 edition of TIME magazine contains this news item:
"Even as the House was promising last week to cut
down on perks in exchange for a pay raise, old habits were asserting
themselves. Speaker Thomas Foley was embarrassed to learn about an
amendment slipped into the defense-spending bill that required an Air
Force C-20 jet be made available to him at all times. A military
version of the Gulfstream III, the C-20 carries just eight passengers
and is serviced by a crew of five.
"But Foley had not
asked for an Air Force Three (the president and vice president have
much larger jets). Pennsylvania Democrat John Murtha had inserted the
provision. He enjoys luxurious travel and undoubtedly figured he could
borrow Foley's jet. The Speaker quickly shot down his own plane."
The TIME article was entitled, "The Crash of Air Force Three," which
raises the question -- should an article about Murtha's latest attempt
to fund new jets for Members of Congress be entitled, "John Murtha and
the Second Crash of Air Force Three," or "John Murtha and the Crash of
Air Force Four?"
(H/T to GrassrootsPa)
Posted
Aug 11 2009, 01:47 PM
by
Timothy McNulty