Timothy McNulty | July 27, 2009
When Jack Murtha went off on reporters at his annual Showcase for Commerce in Johnstown this May, one of the questions that set him off was whether he had hired a defense lawyer. TPM asks the same question and gets a response ("No") from a Murtha spokesman.
Here's TPM, with some extra info on earmarks on the new defense spending bill:
The Feds may be circling uncomfortably close to Rep. John Murtha as
they probe kickbacks to defense contractors and possible
earmarks-for-campaign-cash deals. But the veteran Democratic
power-broker doesn't seem to be sweating it. In fact, he's acting as
defiant as ever.
A Murtha spokesman tells TPMmuckraker that the Pennsylvania
congressman has not hired a lawyer in connection with the
investigations.
Possible legal jeopardy aside, Murtha doesn't even seem inclined to
rein in his penchant for dispensing earmarks to friendly outfits.
Buried in a Wall Street Journal story (sub. req.)
about the Pentagon spending bill that passed Murtha's Defense
Appropriations subcommittee this week is the news that the bill
contains 15 separate Murtha-secured earmarks, worth a total of around
$77 million, for entities whose employees gave to the congressman's
campaigns. One defense contractor, Virginia-based Argon ST Inc., will
get $8 million. Argon's employees, and its political action committee,
have given Murtha $46,600 in contributions since 2007. In all, the
$636.3 billion contains more than 1,100 earmarks, worth a total of more
than $2.7 billion.
Murtha was characteristically unapologetic about the earmarks. His spokesman told the Journal
that the congressman was "proud to secure funding for businesses and
organizations in our district that are delivering quality products and
services to the Defense Department."
Posted
Jul 27 2009, 02:50 PM
by
Timothy McNulty