Timothy McNulty | July 8, 2009
Remember those ugly Obama poll numbers in Ohio yesterday? Nate Silver has more on them below, saying they're tied to the still-struggling economy. (It's likely part of the reason why Joe Biden is doing a speech on the stimulus tomorrow morning in Cincinnati.)
Obama's approval ratings are down by up to 5 percent nationwide, but it's not all bad for the prez, Silver notes:
Obama's approval ratings have declined nationwide
by perhaps 3-5 points since early May. I have little doubt that this
has mostly to do with the flagging economy. Each day, a few more voters
are going to blame Obama for the economic troubles that we're in. If
the economy seems to be showing some "green shoots", as it did in March
and April, then Obama will be fine -- voters don't expect the economy
to turn around overnight. But if the economy isn't showing any signs of
life -- and most of the economic news for the past 45 days or so has
been pretty grim -- he'll fail to keep pace with those modest, but
ever-increasing, expectations, and his approval ratings will decline.
. . . What Ohio hasn't done, though, is suffer uniquely
from the recession. It doesn't have it nearly as bad as its neighbor,
my native state of Michigan, where unemployment is now at 14.1 percent.
And what are Obama's approval ratings like in Michigan?
Not so bad. A Rasmussen poll
in mid-June put Obama's approval there at 59-39, including 39 percent
strongly approving (and remember, Rasmussen has tended to have very
bearish numbers on Obama overall). An EPIC-MRA poll of Michigan in late
May, meanwhile, had 61 percent rating his job performance as
"excellent" or "pretty good".
The point is not that Obama's
approval ratings aren't suffering because of the economy, nor that they
might not be suffering more in states where the economy is worse.
(Whoa, too many double-negatives there). I just doubt that there any
problems Obama has that are so unique to Ohio that you wouldn't also
see them manifested in Michigan or Pennsylvania (where Obama's approval
numbers have also generally been fine).
As such, I think the headlines this poll has generated have been a
little overwritten. It's not that, "Oh no, Obama is going to lose Ohio
in 2012!". It's more just another indication that voters won't have an
infinite amount of patience with Obama on the economy, and if by 2012
the economy still hasn't improved (in which case, we'll be referring to the recession as "GD2"),
or has double-dipped, or has improved sluggishly at the cost of a huge
run-up in the national debt, Obama is going to be in trouble in Ohio as
well as most of the other 49 states.
Posted
Jul 08 2009, 08:46 AM
by
Timothy McNulty