Timothy McNulty | October 29, 2008
We've already posted some of the stories this week about backstage squabbles between McCain and Palin advisors. GQ writer Robert
Draper, who wrote the long epilogue on the McCain campaign last week for the NYT, talks about seeing the warning signs as long ago as the pair's first rally in Washington County.
(Incidentally, that was the same rally where the NYT's Maureen Dowd got kicked off the McCain press plane by one of the major players in this drama, McCain spokeswoman Nicolle Wallace. Maureen serves up a dish on Wallace in today's NYT.)
Draper wrote this in his GQ blog yesterday:
Almost from the very beginning, the Palin pick created tension.
An armada of handlers descended on McCain's running mate like the flying
monkeys in The Wizard Of Oz. The day after the ticket made its debut,
it was August 30 and the campaign staged a rally outside of Pittsburgh, on the
field of a minor league baseball team called the Washington Wild Things. I
remember seeing Tucker Eskew-an old Bush hand out of South Carolina who had
never spent a day in McCain World until Nicolle Wallace recruited him to be
Palin's counselor-wandering around the premises, looking somewhat lost. He and
Wallace took charge of schooling the Alaska governor on message discipline. Two
days later at the GOP convention, an adviser watched them coach Palin on how to
answer routine press questions and warned Steve Schmidt that she was being
overly managed. Three weeks later, Wallace arranged for the interview with her
former CBS colleague Katie Couric, which proved to be a disaster. Meanwhile,
Palin's debate prep was going miserably, to the point where Schmidt had to peel
off from McCain (who was having his own challenges responding to the financial
crisis) and join Nicolle's husband Mark Wallace in simplifying Palin's prep so
as to avert catastrophe. The latter efforts resulted in what one senior adviser
would describe to me with palpable relief as "a campaign-saving
performance."
I'm sympathetic to Eskew and Wallace, and not just because they're decent
people. They've held their tongue from leaking what a couple of McCain
higher-ups have told me-namely, that Palin simply knew nothing about national
and international issues. Which meant, as one such adviser said to me: "Letting
Sarah be Sarah may not be such a good thing." It's a grim binary choice, but
apparently it came down to whether to make Palin look like a scripted robot or
an unscripted ignoramus. I was told that Palin chafed at being defined by her
discomfiting performances in the Couric, Charlie Gibson, and Sean Hannity
interviews. She wanted to get back out there and do more. Well, if you're Eskew
and Wallace, what do you say to that? Your responsibility isn't the care and
feeding of Sarah Palin's ego; it's the furtherance of John McCain's quest for
the presidency.
On the other hand, it had to be hard for Sarah Palin-who has achieved all
she's achieved with a highly personal touch-to take all this ridicule under an
enforced gag order. After being introduced to the world as one of the "Team of
Mavericks," she's admonished not to be one. She's being called out by some
McCainites for not cleaving to all of the senator's positions. The Republicans
who fawned over her superstar looks are now shocked-shocked!-to learn that her
much-admired wardrobe has been purchased with RNC funds. I've heard from one
well-placed source that McCain has snubbed her on one long bus ride aboard the
Straight Talk Express, to the embarrassment of those sitting nearby. It has
surely been implied to the governor that she should be eternally grateful to
have been plucked from obscurity. And yet the high water mark of John McCain's
campaign for the presidency unquestionably began on September 3, when Palin gave
her nomination speech-and ended precisely twelve days later, when McCain went
off-script-I have that on the authority of the person who participated in the
writing of said script-and told an audience that he still believed the
fundamentals of the economy were strong.
UPDATE: Palin tells the WSJ the reports about squabbles are "unbelievable."
Posted
Oct 29 2008, 02:05 PM
by
Timothy McNulty