Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director

 On the eve of one of the biggest home games in recent Pitt history, the Redshirt Diaries wanted to do something a little bit different so we decided to bring to you a Q&A we had with Pitt athletic director Steve Pederson about several subjects including the “turn it blue” promotion (fans encouraged to wear blue to the game Saturday), a ninth football member for the Big East, the state of the football program and of course, kick-off times for games.

Pederson is approaching two years on the job now (well two years since he returned after a rough tenure at Nebraska) and whether you like everything he does or you don’t there are a few things which are undeniable about his approach to this job –

 

1)      Few people love their job more than this guy does and frankly, few people -- outside of perhaps Chancellor Nordenberg and Sports Information Director E.J. Borghetti -- are a more perfect fit for his or her job over there at Pitt given what the college needs at this point in time.

2)      He cares deeply about Pitt fans and about Pitt – and I say that knowing that the “Script or bust” crowd will never forgive him.

3)      He has pushed a lot of the right buttons and has really pushed his staff to work extremely hard to improve the atmosphere at Heinz Field and it has paid off. This year has had the best game-day atmosphere of any since I’ve covered the team in 2002 – and that includes in 2002, 2003 and 2004 when Pitt was filling up the stadium and winning big games. If you walk around the stadium before the game it actually feels like a college football atmosphere and there is a lot going on both in and outside of the stadium.  

 

Pederson may not be the best athletic director in the country – I don’t know how you could quantify that anyway – but I can honestly say that in my two years of observing his act up close and personal, he’s the right guy for this job because Pitt has so many special and unique challenges that a lot of other schools don’t face and he understands them and is trying to take them on one at a time.

 

And know this – while he gets a lot of credit for his work, he’s got a great staff working for him as well. And while we here at the Redshirt Diaries like to poke fun at Pitt's marketing gurus, their minions and Marcus Bowman (hey we’ve tried hard to work him into one of these entries and haven’t been able too yet, so why not), the truth is it is hard to argue with the success they’ve had in boosting ticket sales and making Heinz Field a better place to watch football games for the fans.  

 

And so, without further adieu, here is what Steve Pederson had to say earlier this week on a day when it wasn’t perfectly Pittsburgh or sun-splashed nor did he have to walk with a certain briskness to prove to us he was a man on the move …….  

 

RSD: You are encouraging all fans to wear blue this Saturday for the South Florida game at Heinz Field, but we understand this was an idea that actually came to you from the students. You’ve often said your motto is to put Pitt fans first so can you expand on your feelings on these fan initiatives and why they are so important to you and your staff?

PEDERSON: Our fans have made great suggestions. And when it comes to these fan initiatives – think about it, these are people that come to the games, they know what is going on, they have great ideas and a lot of the ideas they have given us we’ve been able to implement and often times, it is something we haven’t thought of or, for instance, we don’t park in a certain parking lot so we don’t know what’s going on or what’s needed. And with the students there were just certain things that we just didn’t know that they would prefer and they were pretty easy to fix to some extent. Some were a little harder than others but I’ve always thought that if we don’t listen to the people who are most important to us, which is our fans, we are making a big mistake. That doesn’t mean we can do everything people suggest but we have gotten great suggestions that we’ve been able to implement and this [turn it blue promotion]  is case in point something that was sort of a fun thing to do.

 

RSD: So what about this initiative, as opposed to others which have been suggested, made it something you wanted to pursue?

PEDERSON:  I thought this [Turn it Blue promotion] was a neat idea. We’ve listened to the student initiatives on a lot of things and I thought when some of the students said let’s do this, I said ‘it is a good idea, let’s do it’ so I think people will respond to it and participate in it.

 

RSD: You are going to hand out blue Pitt T-shirts to all of the students who come to the game – what else will you do to down at Heinz Field and on campus in order to try and add to the atmosphere in keeping with the theme of the day?

PEDERSON: We decided that we’d do T-shirts for the students and make it fun for them and then just ask everyone else who is coming to wear whatever they have which is blue. We’re going to do some things across campus too – we are going to do as many places as we can around campus. We’re asking merchants to make things blue, we’re doing some things blue on campus and Justin Acierno and a bunch of our marketing people are implementing a lot of different ideas and are even talking about things in the residence halls and in the dining halls so it will be a fun day.

 

RSD: I know ticket sales have been very good for this game – are you guys expecting  a big crowd, say 55,000 or more?

PEDERSON: We expect to have a great crowd for the game Saturday and it will be a fun day. We have a great opponent coming in, it is homecoming – there are a lot of things going on that day and we haven’t been home for a couple of weeks, either, so it is a good time to play at home. And then we are off for two weeks and play again at home, so we have some good momentum building.

 

RSD: You guys have done a great job selling tickets even though the team has been down for a few years. Now that it is coming off a winning season and off to a fast start – do you expect the ticket sales for the final two Big East games after Saturday at home field to really pick up? [Obviously, there are three remaining home games but it goes without saying that the Notre Dame ticket sells itself]

PEDERSON: I think we have some real opportunities here in the second half of the season. The most important thing we did was drive our season ticket base up and now, with the team winning and the excitement surrounding it, I think it gives us an opportunity to take it to another level. And what I like is our people are having fun. They are having fun at the games, people are getting energized by it and Heinz Field is a fun place to be. Here this weekend, now, we have us and the Steelers playing back to back days – I don’t know that there is a city in the country where it gets better than that.

 

RSD: A number of fans have e-mailed me and wanted to voice their displeasure for the noon kick-off and there main gripe is that you said you wanted later kick-offs. How much of the kick-off time is in your control, and how much is based on outside factors, like TV or working with the Pirates?

PEDERSON: It is all TV. That has been controlling the times of our kick-offs. When we’ve been able to choose the kick times, we’ve chosen ideally to do them later in the day if we can. Of course, then we get some people who say ‘hey, why can’t we play at noon, I love the noon games’ so I don’t think there is a general consensus of what people want. I think everybody has different ideas. But it is not ideal and every school in the country goes through this right now, this business of waiting until two weeks before to find out when the kick time is and I think in college football that has become a part of the norm. I hope we can find a better way to do this at some point, I really do, we are not there right now and certainly the game times are being dictated to us and not vice versa. But certainly you want the exposure from being on television and every conference is doing some of the same things but like I said, at some point I hope we can get better control of this so we can give our fans more advance notice on when games are going to be. I wish we could do that but right now – and I’m not any different than any athletic director in the country – we just can’t do that right now.

 

 

RSD: Your first game back as Pitt’s A.D. was that famous 13-9 game [any real Pitt fan doesn’t need to be reminded what game that score is from as it is one of Pitt’s biggest upset wins]and you’ve watched this team go 16-5 since (and counting) that game. Given that record, do you think that, from what you see, this program is indeed headed on the right path and are you excited about its future?  

PEDERSON: I think there are a lot of good things and a lot of very encouraging signs and a lot to be excited about. Certainly we have a very talented team. If you look at our team we have talented people and I think we have an excellent coaching staff. I think the fact that we are able to win games like we did against Connecticut, where we fought back and got things done at the end of the game. Then we had some bad things happen against Rutgers but we withstood it – those things give us a good indication that we are building a good program, not just a good team. And when I watch this program grow, I feel like we are getting on real solid footing and our opportunities ahead are terrific.

 

RSD: Finally, can you add some clarity to this one – a newspaper report a few weeks ago said that the Big East was having serious discussions about adding a ninth football playing member but that is contrary to everything officials from the Big East has said over the past three years. Is there indeed a movement towards a ninth member?

PEDERSON: We haven’t had much of any discussions about that and I think the reason that we haven’t – other than having to respond to the whole ‘well there is a media report that said this’ or sometimes our commissioner will report that there was a story about this school or that school – is that there just hasn’t been an institution emerge that seems to be the right fit for this conference. I think that the only growth we will every see in this conference if there was an institution that all of the sudden just made absolute sense to everybody. There are a lot of great schools out there and they are in their conferences and doing fine, but just in terms of something that makes a difference in our conference or someone who is a great fit for us, there just hasn’t been anybody out there that makes sense that is available for us right now. So of all the things we talk about in the Big East, that is just one we don’t talk about much, if at all.

 


Posted Oct 23 2009, 01:13 AM by Paul Zeise

Comments

thisistheyear wrote re: Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director
on Fri, Oct 23 2009 4:01 AM

paul, great piece, really enjoyed it and gave me new respect for sp and his thought process.

I would've like to have known his thoughts about the script pitt vs the block pitt and  about a return to the mustard yellow and blue so pitt stands out and doesn't look like ga tech, nd, navy, etc.  

also what he thought of how jeff long ran things while he was in neb.

collegesportsfan wrote re: Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director
on Fri, Oct 23 2009 7:42 AM

PZ,  another informative piece.  Thx.

While obviously the BE does not need another team or two from a basketball perspective, it may be inevitable for football.  JoePa has raised the issue of adding another another team to the B10 from the East, and there may be a time when the their conference people decide to give up on ND.  And with the money that the B10 makes on football, it be pretty attractive to a current BE member; sure it may be a stepback on the basketball side but not a large step (except for recruitning.)

But maybe more pertinent is trying to schedule five out-of-conference games every year; it would seem to be very burdensome..  I would not be very surprised at all to see a new fb team or two join the BE.

Bingram wrote re: Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director
on Fri, Oct 23 2009 8:28 AM

I have to say that when Steve first arrived in Pittsburgh, I was a little skeptical, but he has won me over with his energy and enthusiasm. Prior to his arrival, the AD was some bureaucrat doing who knows what, but the guy seems to be everywhere.

Pitt was very fortunate to get him back.

Paul Zeise wrote re: Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director
on Fri, Oct 23 2009 8:52 AM

Good looking out - PZ

theWellHungarian wrote re: Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director
on Fri, Oct 23 2009 9:37 AM

Good Q&A, Paul... I enjoyed it.

to the above commenter, Script Pitt (Mustard Yellow & Royal Blue) vs. Block Pitt (Gold & Navy Blue) would be a stupid question to ask right now during the season, especially on the heels of a big game for Pitt.

pantherpride wrote re: Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director
on Fri, Oct 23 2009 10:56 AM

Really good piece, and I though Pederson's comments were fairly forthright and open. I think he's a great fit for Pitt....and I was thrilled to see him come back!

I agree, Pitt was VERY LUCKY to get him back!

Marmots wrote re: Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director
on Fri, Oct 23 2009 12:34 PM

Paul,

I though the Q&A was rather "ho hum".  

I can't belive you didn't ask about his thoughts bringing back the Pitt script ecspecially knowing how important it is to many Pitt fans.

I do appreciate your insight on Pitt football.  Thanks.  GO PITT!!

Bingram wrote re: Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director
on Fri, Oct 23 2009 12:57 PM

Jeeez...it's been 13 years since the "script" Pitt was used. It's over....let's move on!!

I think the uniforms they are wearing now are pretty sharp...

By the way, when are they going to start building the new stadium in Panther Hollow??

Imma_Man_Im_40 wrote re: Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director
on Fri, Oct 23 2009 1:44 PM

Great RSD!  I met Steve Pederson at an alumni happy hour during March Madness in Denver coupla years back, and found him to be a great guy, surprisingly warm and personable.  He spoke with just me & my son for nearly half an hour, despite 100s of people there.

One thing we talked about at length was the history of the Pitt-Penn State football rivalry.  I told him that in its heyday it was every bit as meaningful and heated (read: fun) as Southern Cal-UCLA, Cal-Stanford, Colorado-Nebraska or A&M-Texas, and only slightly behind Michigan-Ohio State.

I realize that many younger people don’t really care about this game being gone.  But I feel that’s because they don’t know what they’re missing.  I’d argue it was hotter then than our substitute rivalry with WVU today, even after 13-9.

In our meeting, Steve told me they were waiting for a better (more fair) counteroffer from PSU, but a certain stubborn octogenarian was one of the sticking points.  Maybe still is.

Paul, did yaz happen to discuss the progress, if any, in renewing the Pitt-Penn State football game?  If yes, what’s the latest?  If not, can you please ask him a follow-up and issue an amended RSD with his answer?  Thanks!

If we can get the Pitt-PUS game back, I promise I’ll quit harping about the script (smile).

centralvikings97 wrote re: Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director
on Fri, Oct 23 2009 1:46 PM

first i'd like to say i would love to see the script with the current colors...mix of both old and new.  no stripe on the helmet just the script.  I recall a few years ago Gateway had a G on their helmets all year and they came out for the WPIAL championship with the "GATORS" script on their helmets.  I often wish pitt to take warm-ups and come back out for game time with the block gone and script in its place... sorta "green jersey" esque.  

secondly, "Little Italy" will never allow anything built in the hollow. Those people have some kinda hold over city goverment. They wont even open up and old road that used to run through the hollow to the Run in Greenfield.   The area between the hillside and train tracks is not large enough to support a College Football stadium but it is large enough for a high school stadium.  Central Catholic has long wished to acquire land to finally have their own field but again...Little Italy has something on this city.   a better site would be along second ave, across from the UPMC sports works.  There is soooo much land there. It would be less easier to get to than heinz but better than old pitt stadium.... which by the way will be gone 10 years and 1 day when pitt takes on Notre Dame on nov 14th.  I'm hoping Pitt to have something to commemorate this occasion.

Imma_Man_Im_40 wrote re: Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director
on Fri, Oct 23 2009 2:01 PM

One more follow-up Q for the amended RSD:  any updates on the Big 10(11) inviting Pitt to join, thus capping them at 12 members?  ESPN's bloggers continue to predict this will happen, and soon.  Didn't this nearly happen in the aftermath of the exodus of BC, Miami and VA Tech to the ACC?

Imma_Man_Im_40 wrote re: Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director
on Fri, Oct 23 2009 2:13 PM

Sidebar to CentralVikings97:  In case you're new, "the new stadium in Panther Hollow" is an inside joke based on an old rumor that wouldn't die for years, one of Paul's flashpoints (kinda like the Script).  I'm sure Bingram was just jaggin'.

Unless Heinz Field falls down and stays down, I don't think Pitt can afford a new stadium again in my lifetime, especially in this rotten economy.  Unless:

Paul, I presume Allegheny County is still heavily Democrat?  Maybe we can start a new rumor: Obama's TARP funds for a new Pitt Stadium?

centralvikings97 wrote re: Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director
on Fri, Oct 23 2009 2:26 PM

i wouldnt mind seeing Heinz field fall down... how can me (5'8" 155lbs) be as uncomfortable as i am in those seats... my knee hits the stupid cup holder that was designed to fit a cup with a handle which they dont even sell there so instead my $4 bottle of iced tea falls over and spills because they consessions people take the caps like you are gonna chuck a full $4 bottle on the field.. I would take cramped and uncomfortable seating and horrible parking at Pitt Stadium any day over Heinz Field.

Bingram wrote re: Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director
on Fri, Oct 23 2009 3:26 PM

I was kidding about the stadium in Panther Hollow, but how about this?

Pitt is building a soccer stadium on top of the hill as part of the new Petersen Athletic Complex. So what they do is start building, and don't stop until the place holds...say...50,000. We set up some goalposts and bada bing bada bang, we got a football stadium!!

I think they call that a fait accompli...

Then we build a wooden horse...

centralvikings97 wrote re: Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director
on Fri, Oct 23 2009 3:50 PM

i dont care much about the sport of basketball so i'm still all for tearing the pete down for a new pitt stadium... i feel like i'm walking on a grave everyitme i've been in there.

Joe Lawrence wrote re: Steve Pederson Speaks - A Q&A with Pitt's athletic director
on Fri, Oct 23 2009 4:54 PM

Thanks for the piece, Paul. When he returned, Pederson sent a nice letter to season ticket holders asking for input. I appreciated his gesture and made some suggestions, a few of which were implemented. He continues to listen which is extremely important. I concur with Bingram that we were lucky to get him back - even if the hiring at Callahan at Nebraska still has me scratching my head.

Regarding all the Big Ten talk...I have very mixed feelings about such a move and would rather see the Big East attract another team or force ND's hand. The BE makes so much more sense geographically for Pitt and we get very good TV exposure on the east coast.

BTW....Am I the only guy who thinks this year's all white away uniforms are a step back from last year's blue pants with white jersey? The all white belongs to Rutgers or Louisville in my view.