Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans

Hey folks, for the last few years, Star-Ledger Rutgers reporter, Brendan Prunty, has asked me a series of questions about Pitt leading up to the Pitt-Rutgers game and then published my answers on the newspapers web-site as a service to Rutgers fans who were looking for a little bit of information/insight on the Panthers.

This year, I figured, I'll give him the information, so why not get him to answer questions you - Pitt fans who read this blog - might have, so hopefully you enjoy this new twist on the Q&A......

1.)     How good is Rutgers freshman quarterback Tom Savage?

PRUNTY: Is he capable of winning a game if the running game is stuffed? From what we've seen so far, he has all of the tools a coach would want in a big-time quarterback. He's tall enough (6-4) to see over the line and make the throws, he's got a big arm (that's still developing) and he has that sense that all QBs need in the pocket when to move when they're feeling pressure.

That being said ... I have no idea if he can win a game like this, especially if the running game isn't clicking. He's only played one full game so far (last week against Texas Southern) and has yet to start a game against a BCS conference opponent. Coming off of the concussion he suffered almost a month ago against Florida International, he's been handled gently, with Greg Schiano having to hold him out of practice at first and then ease him back in advance of Texas Southern. He was 14-for-21 last weekend, which was encouraging, but it was against one of the worst 1-AA teams around. He'll need to have RB Joe Martinek performing as usual to help take some pressure off of him, otherwise it could get ugly.





2.) Rutgers offensive line has been hyped as one of the best in the country -- has it performed that way so far?




PRUNTY: Absolutely not. This offensive line has come around the last two to three games, but it is still nowhere near the expectations that people had of it coming into the season. I — like many others — expected it to be one of, if not, the best O-lines in the Big East. But it just hasn't happened. We're still not sure if it's that they were overrated to begin with, that they haven't gelled yet or they've been manhandled a lot. It's likely a combination of the three. Center Ryan Blaszczyk is a senior and three-year starter, but he's continually had problems with his left ankle. He's played through it, but there have been a number of times where he's been seriously limping during games and has been seen using crutches afterwards. The tackles have probably been the most disappointing part of the line so far: future NFL LT Anthony Davis has been so-so this year and RT Kevin Haslam has, at times, seemed over-matched. Davis showed up to camp overweight and out-of-shape (which Schiano only recently said was because an eye injury limited his workout ability) and hasn't shown that "mean streak" that we saw out of him last season. Sophomore Art Forst is quite good at RG, but Schiano's only recently found his LG in former defensive lineman Desmond Wynn. This offensive line is still a work in progress.


3.) It looks like Rutgers is using a running back-by-committee approach -- can you give us a run down of the Scarlet Knights tailbacks and how they differ and how they compare to say a Ray Rice?

PRUNTY:
Trying to figure out Rutgers' running back situation is like trying to figure the New England Patriots': it's impossible. Joe Martinek is the closest thing that Schiano will come to determining a No. 1 running back, because he's been the only one of the four that's been able to do it consistently. Martinek is a natural running back, with tremendous instincts, who can find the holes that aren't there and make things happen. His one pitfall might be that he takes it outside too often and doesn't do enough running between the tackles. But when you're the all-time leading rusher in New Jersey high school history, no one's questioning your methods.

The rest are a bunch of wild cards. Jourdan Brooks has the size (6-1, 230 pounds) and speed combo that make coaches drool, but he can never seem to get on track. His 10 career TDs in only 15 games are nice ... until you realize that seven of them came against 1-AA opponents. Kordell Young had a career filled with promise, but has battled knee troubles his entire career and has only recently gotten back into the backfield fold. However, Schiano has gone to him as his third-down back, a role which he has been thriving in. And then there's De'Antwan Williams, a true freshman nicknamed "Rocket" because well, he's really, really fast. We've only gotten glimpses of him in two games (Howard, Texas Southern), but he's 221 yards on 33 carries. He's a lot like Ray Rice in that he can turn a 5-yard loss into a 40-yard touchdown run.


4.) The Rutgers defense likes to blitz traditionally. Has that continued this year and can we expect to see a ton of blitzes from the Scarlet Knights against Pitt? How good is the front seven?

PRUNTY: You wouldn't think that the front seven would be that good considering they have two undersized, first-year starters at DT, a converted DT at DE and a first-year starter at linebacker. But it's working quite well since the Cincinnati debacle. They're third in the Big East with 18 sacks, only eight behind Pittsburgh. But aside from that, what this defense does best is make things chaotic around the quarterback enough to cause turnovers. That's been the big thing for Rutgers since Cincinnati. They're tops in the league in turnover margin at +12 and they've registered a defensive touchdown for three straight games (including two against Maryland). What Rutgers can't get stuck doing (which happened against Cincinnati) is putting this defense in a zone. They don't have the athletes to play it and it takes away their ball-hawking ability.




5.) Greg Schiano a few years ago was considered one of the top young coaches in the country. Is he still perceived that way or has the shine sort of rubbed off the golden boy a little since he hasn't been able to duplicate the magical season of 2006? Are the fans getting restless that he hasn't won a Big East title yet?

PRUNTY: That's been the 800-pound gorilla in the room this season. Fans had big expectations that this would be Rutgers' year to finally win a Big East title: they thought they had a great running game (getting back to par), a great offensive line (not so much), a great defense (about right) and a down Big East (kinda). Well, Cincinnati blew that all up. I don't think that Rutgers fans are seriously considering the Big East title a reality this year, but should Schiano take a freshman offense to a 9-3/8-4 record and a bowl game, you would consider this season a success. However, that will really put the pressure on for next year to win the big one. Think about it — only two teams have never won at least a share of the Big East title: Rutgers and South Florida. If he doesn't do it with Savage and this freshman class, then maybe it's time to reexamine.

Also, as an added bonus, Rutgers football received a verbal commitment from Piscataway wide receiver Jawaun Winn while Pittsburgh earned verbals from Don Bosco Prep standouts Bryan Murphy and Brandon Sacco. As the two Big East schools prepare for their game on Friday night, these highly-touted recruits will be watching in earnest. Murphy, Sacco, and Wynn add theirs insights on the rivalry and why they ultimately chose their respective schools. This segment includes in-game footage of all three-players.

The video was set up by the Star-Ledger's Vincent Velasquez and can be found here.....


Posted Oct 15 2009, 01:58 AM by Paul Zeise

Comments

MN_Pittman wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 7:58 AM

Thanks Paul, should be a good game Friday night!

collegesportsfan wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 9:37 AM

very informative blog ... thanks also. Despite the fact that host teams usually do extremely well in nationally televised Thursday and Friday night ESPN games, I am more positive about this game at Rutgers tha I was last week at home vs UConn .. I just think it is a better match-up for Pitt.

Despite's USF's front 4 which may well be among the best in the NCAA, I believe Cincy is the better team. However,one thing I will look for is how the Cincy defense fares in the latter part of the game.  Note that the temps in Florida has  been near 90s and humid. I have already seen WVU and Pitt go south in warm, humid climates ... both started out as looking to be the dominant team only to see their defense look exhausted asthe game wore on.  Cincy,despite its record, often loses the time of possession battle .. it should be interesting to see how it plays out.

Pitt Blather — The Rantings Continue Permalink » Runnin’ Down Rutgers Stuff wrote Pitt Blather — The Rantings Continue Permalink » Runnin’ Down Rutgers Stuff
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 12:03 PM

Pingback from  Pitt Blather — The Rantings Continue  Permalink   » Runnin’ Down Rutgers Stuff

pantherpride wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 12:12 PM

Hey Paul,

    This is the guy who goes on every chat in the region to lambast you for saying over "half the fans" left Heinz Field on Sunday. Just kidding....I think that fellow has about 14 out of the 18 characteristics to be labelled a serial killer!!

    Anyhow, this is a GREAT addition to the blog and I'm hoping you and even Ray can do it for every game. It was verry insightful and thanks again!!!

collegesportsfan wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 12:25 PM

please note that I went on Paul's previous blog as well as Smizik's blog earlier in the week to lambast Paul about the 'half of fans' statement .... however, I noticed that someone else took up my slack on Jerry Micco's chat yesterday .... thus, there are at least 2 potential serial killers in the area.  Anyway, I agree with panherpride that this would be a very good addition to this blog.

pantherpride wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 12:38 PM

collegesportsfan,

    I am sorry and was trying to be funny....we've never met but I'm sure you're not a serial killer! LOL!

     BUT....I can't back down totally....that guy on Micco's chat yesterday just wouldn't let it go!!! I mean he kept coming back three times I think to it and called Paul's view on it "sensationalistic". He must've been the father of one of Pitt's marketing folks!!!

    Sorry, again, dude....I meant no offense to you.

Fail Pitt wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 12:45 PM

One thing that csf fails to consider - and there is always one thing that he or she fails to consider - is that Paul might be right or he may be wrong; but if he is wrong it is only because the University of Pittsburgh insists on publishing false and misleading attendance numbers.

There can be no question that a large portion of people attending the Pitt-UConn game left early in the fourth quarter.  Whether it was half or not depends upon the actual number in attendance.  If the reported number of 45,000 spectators  is accurate (note:  this is highly doubtful), then, yes, half the fans left.  If, as I firmly believe based upon the number of empty seats throughout the game, the actual number in attendance was closer to 30,000 fans, then half the fans did not leave; only a quarter did.  Either way, Pitt's attendance is awful and fitting for a substandard football program.

pantherpride wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 12:57 PM

Not that its right, but I'm quite sure Pitt treats their "attendance" figures like every sport's entity in existence....they base it off of the number of tickets that were sold/given away etc....not on the number of fannies who go thru the turnstiles.

Again, don't think its right - but it isn't like Pitt is doing something that nobody else does. Hell, I think the Pirates base their attendance figures to include people who drove by PNC Park that day and THOUGHT about attending a game at some point in their lives!!!

MN_Pittman wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 2:03 PM

Got to the love the nitters (who constantly rant about how Pitt/PSU isn't a rivalry anymore I might add) coming on a Pitt blog and calling our progam substandard.  Last time I looked Pitt and PSU have the exact same record and Pitt has played a tougher schedule.  Also, Pitt is ranked 26 in the AP poll this week and if they win Friday night they will more than likely be ranked in the top 25. If you want to talk about substandard, then lets talk about PSU's non-conference schedule.  Now that's as substandard as it gets, lol.

MN_Pittman wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 2:29 PM

"Despite's USF's front 4 which may well be among the best in the NCAA, I believe Cincy is the better team. However,one thing I will look for is how the Cincy defense fares in the latter part of the game.  Note that the temps in Florida has  been near 90s and humid. I have already seen WVU and Pitt go south in warm, humid climates ... both started out as looking to be the dominant team only to see their defense look exhausted asthe game wore on.  Cincy,despite its record, often loses the time of possession battle .. it should be interesting to see how it plays out."

CSF, I wish both these teams could win tonight.  If SF loses they're probably out of the top 25 and if Cinci loses then they're definitely out of the top 10.  

I think Cinci will win, just because they have a more complete team and better coaching. SF always seams to blow these  kind of games, but I wouldn't be surprised if they win tonight.  This looks like a great game.  Hopefully, it won't disappoint.

Fail Pitt wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 3:10 PM

Not a "Nitter", just a realist.  Also not sure that Pitt's schedule has been all that tough.  After Navy, what do you have?  NC State (loss) lost to Duke!  Louisville (win) is terrible.  Youngstown State (win) is a non-entity.  Buffalo (win) is a non-entity.  UConn (win) is in rebuilding mode.  Even Navy's claim to fame is almost beating Ohio State; not that they did it, mind you.

I won't defend PSU's schedule - it's awful - but I'm pretty sure that Iowa is far better than anyone Pitt will play all year and they're probably not as good as OSU.  My point:  Pitt's schedule is not something that anyone should boast about.  Please return to boasting about Pitt's win over Iowa (thus Pitt > Iowa > PSU) while ignoring PSU's win over Oregon State (thus PSU > Ore St. > Pitt); it's what Pitt fans do.

thisistheyear wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 3:21 PM

Pitt and PSU is not a rivalry anymore because they don't play, the rivalry is on hiatis.  Kinda how the pirates and phillies were a heated rivalry back in the day, then mlb reailgned the divisons and now the rivalry just isn't there(well that and the pirates just stink)  

If and/or when PITT and PSU play again and for more then just back to back years then one of the best rivalries in college sports will be back, well at least one of the best rivialries in PA college sports.

thisistheyear wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 3:47 PM

sorry for beating a dead horse about pitt/psu that game just needs to happen to help both schools in recruiting in the north.  

anyway

I hope pitt football can do what other pitt sports haven't been able to do, and that is come up with a big win in a big spot.  If Pitt althetics (well b-ball and f-ball)has taught us one thing it is to not get all hyped up because they will let you down.  Pitt b-ball losing before the final four this year(and the past couple of years for that matter) pitt f-ball losing to nc state, oregon st, heck ND in wanny's debut. or ohio u that season or well just pick from paul's list of top 10 losses.

well that being said

I sure hope PITT proves me wrong and comes up with a big win.  The program really needs it, wanny really needs it, and well us long suffering PITT fans really need it!  LET GO PITT!!!  I just am hoping for the best but trying to prepare for the worst.

reasons why pitt will lose:

Rutgers has their number. pitt is 0-4 vs rutgers under wanny

Home teams vs higher ranked teams on thur/fri always seem to win

The wanny gameday factor, wanny bad gameday coach and seems to be outcoached by shacino(sp) every year

Reasons why Pitt will win:

Pitt is better

Pitt won @ louisville on fri night just a couple weeks ago so they should have confidence

Pitt is due vs rutgers.

Wanny has learned some lessons from his mistakes in the past losses.

Pitt has played well lately

Fail Pitt wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 3:55 PM

PSU needs no help in recruiting (I believe ESPN has their current class in the Top 10, maybe Top 5) and playing Pitt is lose-lose.  If PSU wins, then they get no credit because elite teams are supposed to beat up on BE teams.  If Pitt wins, it makes their season.

thisistheyear wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 3:56 PM

fail pitt, it is true both sched's can use some improvement, but pitt has been trying to schedule penn st and penn state has refused to schedule them . psu has played sub-par teams instead of scheduling PITT, that is the bases of the arguement.

conference paly is confernce play, you can't do anything about that but no conf you can and lets face it navy and heck even buffalo and nc state are a step up from temple, akron, ne illinios high schoolor whoever the paycheck psu played last week was.

Fail Pitt wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 4:06 PM

Again, I won't defend the indefensible (PSU's schedule), but why should PSU play Pitt.  So some lowly Panther fans can feel good about their team once in every four years when Pitt beats PSU?  The fact is, if Pitt took the 6-4 (Beaver Stadium-Heinz Field) split that PSU offered years ago, this game would still be played.  To PSU's detriment, I believe.

thisistheyear wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 4:26 PM

wow psu an elite team?  an overrated team maybe, if psu were an "elite team" they would be like USC. play anyone, anywhere, anytime.  

If psu beats pitt, and according to you that it should not be a problem, then they get no credit?? what beating beating illinios high school, akron, temple and syracusegave psu credit?  It makes them a joke when they come in and lose their first game against a legit team.  Listen I'm not saying PITT is great but I think they are getting to a point where they are on par w/ psu. PSU scheduled 'cuse a BE team and a bottom feeder at that where is credit there?  psu used to play cinci, cinci became legit and psu dropped them.  why is psu ducking legit teams?  are they hiding something?

the big ten my friend (fail pitt)isn't a great conf anymore.  their top team OSU gets blown out in every bowl they go to, they play one top tier out of confernece game every year and it is "boy we just hope to keep it close and not get embrassed" "and the rest of non conf sched is a joke.  i think the big ten is living off reputatution the past few years and not on field performance of their teams.

I think all the bigger schools (top 30 programs) need to start scheduling some better non conf games.  FLA vs TROY that game was a joke, and it goes on and on.  schools should take a page from miami's schedule this year.  look it put them in the top 15 and that is w/one loss and they weren't on anyones radar when the season started.

collegesportsfan wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 4:45 PM

I don't give a darn if there were 30,000 or 45,000 total attendance, there is no way that only half of the original crowd stayed.  If you look at any replay or picture of the any of the final drive, you will notice very, very few empty seats in the background, except in te corners of the upper deck which were vacant at the beginning.

P-Pride, I admittedly have some traits of a serial killer, but have never owned a gun.

Fail Pitt,  while Iowa may well be better than anybody Pitt has played, please note they won at Beaver Stadium ... buy more importantly, they struggled at home to beat Northern Iowa by 2 and the opnener, and beat Arkansas St by only 3 the week after beating PSU ... easily as pathetic than any of NC St's losses.

collegesportsfan wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 4:47 PM

Note it was snowing in norhtern Ney Jersey today, and is supposed to be cold and damp tomorrow ... while the temp is expected to be over 80 degrees tonight at USF.

thisistheyear wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 4:51 PM

it should be a 4-4 split w/ two neutral site games.  but i agree 6-4 is better then what we have now!

collegesportsfan wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 5:01 PM

thisistheyear,  how is not beating UConn in bb last year, both home and away, and both times when they were No.1, not a big win?  Also note that they lost a chance at the final 4 at the buzzer to the same team who only 2 nights before whooped Duke (Coack K baby!!) by 22 points.

Also, speaking of not winning the big games .... PSU, with the easy B10 and non-conf schedule, twice blew their chance at playing for the national title in the past 4 years by blowing big leads in the 4th quarter ... just like they did to Iowa a few weeks ago.

Fail Pitt wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 5:29 PM

One season with similar records does not make PSU and Pitt equals.  If it did, then Pitt would also be USC's equal based upon this year's record alone.  However, Pitt routinely struggles to win 9 games and has won 10 only a handful of times since the early 80s.  PSU has won 9 games or more four years in a row.  PSU > Pitt.

As for schedules, please don't make me defend PSU's schedule.  OK, one point.  PSU scheduled Syracuse years ago (right after McNabb left); they had no idea that the Cuse would fall to Pitt's level.  Without looking, I don't think that PSU has played Cincy for a while and since the scheduling is done years in advance, it's not really fair to say that they're ducking a team that hasn't been above mediocre for more than a year or two.

With that said PSU should play better teams.  Another reason NOT to play Pitt.

CSF, please reread my post.  Perhaps fewer than half the fans left, but Paul looked around and saw roughly half of the reported attendance still in their seats.  Would that be disingenous?  On the part of Pitt, perhaps, but not on behalf of the reporter.

collegesportsfan wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 6:18 PM

I certainly observed much more than half of the fans still in their seats in the 4th quarter ... as did many people who commented on Paul's statement on 'Pitt Blather' ... (Pitt's blog similar to Black Shoes Diaries)

No doubt that PSU has been better than Pitt in the 2nd part of this decade (but definitely not in the 1st half, and no Pitt follower claims it as as elite  ... however, there is still no 'on-the-field' evidence that PSU is still an elite team.  

It is elite in that it draws over a 100,000 and gets much TV exposure ... but it clearly plays in an overrated conference over the past 5 years, and an 'elite' team does not fold in the 4th quarter in nearly evry bug game they play over the past few years.

thisistheyear wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 7:41 PM

come on fail, Pitt might not be great but they are not at 'cuse's level.   also playing PITT would be a major step up in PSU's non conf schedule, so maybe PSU should humor people and take some baby steps and schedule a competive BE team , (like PITT) instead of Temple (who got kicked out of the BE due to not being competitive) or that highschool team they played last week.

as for pitt b-ball csf yeah they did have some big wins this year and i overlooked them but i was trying to make a point that PITT more often then not doesn't come up big in big spots, WVU game a couple years ago and some recent b-all games excluded.

EyeOfAPanther.com wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 8:32 PM

12-0

MN_Pittman wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Fri, Oct 16 2009 9:25 AM

Paul, I think you left the door to your blog open a little too much, because the trolls (fail Pitt) are starting to come in.  You don't want this to become a troll fest like Smiziks blog do you?

Big win for Cinci last night!  It's amazing the depth they have!  

Also, If Pitt can find a way to win this game tonight they should be able to crack the top 25.  Hopefully, they can get the job done!  

thisistheyear wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Fri, Oct 16 2009 12:46 PM

A win tonite will be a nice step forward in Pitt's climb up the latter, and one question answered by wanny.

but lets not get our hopes up remember wanny is 0-4 vs shiano and rutgers

MN_Pittman wrote re: Star-Ledger writer answers a few questions for Pitt fans
on Fri, Oct 16 2009 1:04 PM

"but lets not get our hopes up remember wanny is 0-4 vs shiano and rutgers"

Yep, and that is completely unacceptable!  0-4 against Rutgers ) -: I never thought I would live to see the day...the only thing worse would be to go 0-4 against Temple.  We need to put an end to this madness tonight!  Come on Panthers, lets get the job done!!