Pittsburgh Symphony reviews arrive from Europe

The Pittsburgh Symphony's recent short festival tour to Europe garnered the fewest amount of reviews I have ever seen on a European trek. They have been translated, and I thought instead of interpreting them with excerpts, I would use the virtual endless space of the Web to let you look at them in their entirety

As you can see, the first two are of the PSO's concerts closing the Lucerne Festival and they contain some sharp criticisms. I was wondering myself about using the same encores each night. I didn't write about it because I thought Honeck and the venue (KKL) might have known something I didn't about the audience make-up. I heard the same good response both nights, so I might not be wrong here. But as for the rest, some of what the critics have written is just their opinion. Not how one doesn't like the sound quality of "Der Freischutz" and the other in Bonn praised it. What are you gonna do -- critics are people. But what I don't like is the constant reiteration of the fraudulent Big Five bias. That is simply lazy journalism as the landscape is changing and those European critics need stop using it as a crutch to "explain" the US landscape:

 Lucerne

September 21st, 2009
Neue Züricher Zeitung, Zürich, Switzerland
Worthy Finale
The Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra with Manfred Honeck
By Thomas Schacher


It may not be one of the “Big Five” American orchestras, but the quality of the Pittsburgh Symphony hardly ranks behind any of those legends.  This is in part due to the fact that over the last 50 years the ensemble has been lead by such outstanding conductors as William Steinberg, Andre Previn, Lorin Maazen, and Mariss Jansons.  For one year now, Manfred Honeck, who is also the General Music Director of the Stuttgart Staatsoper, has served as Principal Conductor of the PSO.

Tested and Proven
Honeck has taken his first European tour with the Pittsburgh Symphony.  After two “dress rehearsals” in Essen and Bonn, the orchestra gave guest performances for both of the closing concerts of the Lucerne Festival.  Their program, with Beethoven’s violin concerto and Dvorak’s 8th on the first night, in addition to Strauss’ Four Last Songs and Bruckner’s 4th on the second night, was not exactly notable for its originality.  Additionally, there seemed of a lack of imagination as the same encore was played on both nights.

One’s lasting impression is that from the performances of the two outstanding soloists.  The Russian violinist Viktoria Mullova, who played the solo part in the D-Major violin concerto by Ludwig van Beethoven, stuck to a cool interpretation of the piece.  However, to assume that she fit the stereotype would not do her justice.  Certainly she didn’t flamboyantly wave her bow through the air in attempt to win over the audience; instead she stood upright in concentration: she had the posture of one listening carefully.  And what one heard was something fantastic.  Mullova presented the work not with a theme of heroicism, nor with one of romanticism, but in a way which one can only describe as calm emotionality.  It was a tightrope-walk between rational control and poignant letting-go.  For example, in the slow movement she played tenderly, but not overly so.  This approach was not one-hundred percent in-line with that of the conductor, but surprisingly this led to a productive tension.

Songs of Parting
A challenge of an entirely different sort is that of the “Four Last Songs” of Richard Strauss, the final opus of the composer.  These richly orchestrated songs with text by Hermann Hesse and Joseph von Eichendorff focus on the theme of farewell, with images taken from days, years, and entire lifetimes.  The soprano Christine Schäffer vocally shaped the piece in a way that was artistically very impressive.  Her voice was light, even radiant in “Frühling”, and dark and withdrawn in “September”.  This mixture of piece of mind and foreshadowing of death that this piece brought to mind was, like the soprano’s voice in “Im Abendrot”, simply stirring.  The orchestra, even when tutti, was able to bring out ominously quiet tones.

Manfred Honeck is a conductor who loves surprise and dramatic effect.  This was already apparent in the “Freischutz” Overture by Carl Maria von Weber, which opens the floodgates when such an approach is taken.  Dvorak’s 8th Symphony also gives hints as to his style.  The piece can be played in a “romantic” style that accentuates the soft, the pastoral, the quasi-Bohemian.  This certainly came out in the Pittsburgh Symphony’s performance, but it served primarily as a contrast foil to dramatic outbursts.  This can be seen through the development and coda of the first movement.  That the coda would take on such a militaristic steak could not have been envisioned by the composer.  The rapid and overly-loud end of the finale can also only be taken as grandstanding.  The orchestra played both the lyrical and the striking with great ease, and brought out fantastic tone colors, particularly in the woodwinds.

If Dvorak focused on contrast, the focus of the interpretation of the 4th Symphony by Anton Bruckner was on development.  For example, take the start of the first movement: from out of nothing comes the flickering of the strings, and from that soars the soft and gentle signal of the solo horn.  Gradually, the symphonic events unfold from these beginnings.  Honeck understood Bruckner’s denotation of the 4th as “romantic” to mean a naturalistic blooming and fading.  The result of this was that he didn’t overemphasize the stark or the heroic, as he certainly had the right to do, but instead placed emphasis on the organic.  The highpoints, even if they sounded very loud, were never ends in themselves, but instead always the result of the proceeding development.  Here the brass executed first-rate work.

 

September 21st, 2009
Stuttgarter Zeitung, Stuttgart, Germany
Lightning-fast Orchestra Machine

Lucerne The Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra and Manfred Honeck close the Lucerne Festival.  By Götz Thieme
Among summertime music festivals, the Lucerne Festival boasts one of the most exclusive gatherings of influential orchestras and conductors.  This year there were 32 orchestra performances given by the Berlin and Vienna Philharmonics; the Concertgebouw Orchestra of Amsterdam; orchestras from London, Chicago, Leipzig, Dresden, and Oslo; with conductors such as Abbado, Boulez, Chailly, Mehta, Salonen, Haitink, Rattle, Hannoncourt, and the much-sought-after Andris Nelson, born in 1978, who came as a guest with the Birmingham Symphony Orchestra.
A Short Trip to Europe
Once again the season closing draws attention, this time with the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra, in the place of the San Francisco Symphony, which cancelled due to financial difficulties.  Their last time at Lucerne was under chief conductor Mariss Jansons in 2003.  For his successor Manfred Honeck, who in 1996 and 2000 was still only a B-lister, the concert on Friday night in the Kultur- und Kongresszentrum was his local debut with his new orchestra.  Last year the Stuttgart general music director took up his post in Pittsburgh.
A few days before the trip to Europe, in which the musicians from the America’s Steel City also went to Essen and Bonn, before they gave two concerts on the Vierwaldstätter See, Honeck’s contract was extended until 2016.  This relationship promises to be a lasting one.  The relationship between Honeck and intendant Lawrence Tamburri appears relaxed, professional, and full of confidence that Honeck will bring Pittsburgh into the league of America’s best orchestras and close to the famous Big Five (New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Chicago).
As the baton was raised for Weber’s “Freischutz” Oveture, none of that was yet apparent, despite the discipline of the musicians and their quick reactions to their director—sound-wise it seemed more fatigued, more thin forest light than thick forest green; the excellent clarinet solo didn’t make up for this somewhat unpoetic  version.  In the Beethoven violin concerto, Viktoria Mullova, often senza vibrato, in the spirit of the performance style, joined two musical worlds together.  According to reports, at the rehearsals in Bonn there was a clash: the abrasive tone in which the exiled Russian conveyed her musical ideas to the orchestra might have agitated some musicians—Honeck was able to smooth things out.
Even so, the unsentimental, dry interpretation did the oft-mishandled work good; that Mullova occasionally played too deep was excusable, even more so after her introspective and flawless Bach performance. 
In Antonin Dvorak’s 8th Symphony, it was like a whole new orchestra, bursting with vitality (despite two empty seats in the strings due to the Jewish new-year celebration Rosh Hashanah), a  steel-powered, impressive orchestra machine.  In the strings (with first-class cello and bass sections) and woodwinds, one could start to make out the first traces of Honeck’s work on his musical ideal; the strings had a shimmering tone, tight and musical when needed.  The brass, however, often cut in too boldly, and the horns were enormously showy in their trills during the Finale—they can afford it: that’s a real group of virtuosos. 

Rosy Future in Stuttgart is Possible
Honeck is crazy about this group of highly-motivated musicians—despite this, Stuttgart has not lost its importance for him.  He would also like to continue through 2011; the choir and orchestra stand behind him, and the music theater didn’t want to let him go, he said.  His collaboration with Stefan Herheim in “Rosenkavelier” (premier on November 1st) has turned out to be a positive one.  The future with Stuttgart could be rosy; Honeck has received requests from China for a guest-performance with the State Opera—though the timetable worries him.  For a long while he has been penciling dates into his calendar even after 2011.  He can’t wait until the end of the year.  Whoever is nominated tomorrow as opera intendant should speak to Honeck soon.

 Bonn

September 18th, 2009
General-Anzeiger, Bonn, Germany
World-Class Orchestra Wows Audience in Bonn

Under the baton of Manfred Honeck, the Pittsburgh Symphony enchants listeners with pieces from Weber, Beethoven, and Dvorak
By Fritz Herzog
Bonn.  There are orchestras that one can recognize just from their sound.  When one hears the silky-soft strings, warm woodwinds, and flawless but never martially blustering brass of the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra, he has no doubt about which orchestra he is listening to.
The orchestra was founded in the last decade of the 19th century in the capital city of the US state of Pennsylvania [translator’s note: No, Pittsburgh is not the capital of Pennsylvania], and while it may not number among the legendary “Big Five”, it formed a strong affinity to the German repertoire, not least because of orchestra-builders Otto Kleperer and Fritz Reiner, who both had roots in the “Old World” but fled the Nazi regime. 
This hardly changed under later conductors such as André Previn and Lorin Maazel.  After Mariss Jansons and Marek Janowski, the Austrian conductor Manfred Honeck has stood on the rostrum before the elite ensemble of the former steel-metropolis Pittsburgh since 2007.
Honeck, who is concurrently the general music director of the Stuttgart Staatsoper, places the emphasis on Viennese tradition in his work with the Pittsburgh musicians.
As a former member of the Vienna Philharmonic, he has a veritable wealth of experience to draw upon.  What’s more, from his gestures and the intensity of his musical expressiveness, one is reminded of Carlos Kleiber, but without the attitude of an eccentric, as Kleiber himself was.
Of the musicians on the program, which included Weber’s “Freischütz” Overture, the Beethoven violin concerto, and Dvorak’s Symphony No. 8, not one was at all unfamiliar with the repertoire.  However, the exceptional presence that was brought to each of these pieces was due not least to the German seating arrangement, which among other details includes the second violins sitting across from the first.
This gave the scores a remarkable plasticity which made this evening in the almost-sold-out Beethoven Festival Hall a true experience.  During the course of the “Freischütz"-Ouvertüre the orchestra had already given out their calling card as a highly-cultivated, exceedingly subtle ensemble: When out of almost complete silence a pianissimo is articulated just as in-time as it is in-tune, it is breathtaking. 
The soloist for Beethoven’s op.61, Viktoria Mullova, was no less exceptional.  The piece opened significantly with timpani, seconded by woodwinds.  There was no doubt in anyone’s mind about Mullova’s extensive training in Bach.
Despite an aristocratic severity, her interpretation was highly musical.  With pizzicato that was almost tender, the soloist was picked up out of the cadenza by the strings.  The result of the Larghetto was an intimate dialogue, which was particularly intense between the bassoon and solo violin.
Dvorak’s opulent op. 88 is marked with idioms borrowed from Slavic tradition and Tchaikovsky’s emotionality, and by its closeness with “Rusalka”-romanticism.  The end brings to mind images of Bohemian folklore.  The musical ideas come across almost in high-definition, clear down to the smallest detail.  Dreamlike, the Scherzo seamlessly flows into the fury of the final movement.
As encores, Honeck and his Pittsburghers sprung for “Morgenstimmung” from Grieg’s “Peer Gynt” and a razor-sharp Hungarian Dance No. 5 by Brahms.

 


Posted Nov 03 2009, 01:38 AM by Andrew Druckenbrod

Comments

Hassenpfeffer wrote re: Pittsburgh Symphony reviews arrive from Europe
on Tue, Nov 3 2009 6:30 AM

Ha! Let's see Rendell choke on his morning coffee upon learning that Pittsburgh is the state capital! (If that were the case, wouldn't we have much better roads?)

Andrew, any idea why the Europeans are so fixated on the "Big Five" American orchestras? That's a very 1960s notion to me. At the moment I'd say the PSO has a better conductor than the Cleveland or NYPhil, and I don't think the Philly has had much of an impact in a decade or more. It seems to me that the "Big Five" are riding on past glories, just as Pittsburgh continues to get slapped with the "Steel City" label.

Andrew Druckenbrod wrote re: Pittsburgh Symphony reviews arrive from Europe
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 1:55 PM

The reason is two fold, at least.

One, Europeans in the classical music scene don't consider America to be all that significant (or don't want to). They simply don't think much about us except when our orchestras intrude. They listen and follow their own contemporary composers (not to mention the past greats) and they have their own star soloists. If anything are interested in looking to Asia or S. America.

Of course I am exaggerating, but I think this is at the basis of it. It certainly is the case for the European critics. I know a lot of them and they are very Euro-centric focused. The cynic would say this is a nifty way to retain their prominence on the classical music mountain, but it might be better attributed to people writing about what is around them. But don't discount that, frankly, classical music is their music -- it was born there and flourished there over centuries and we are still outsiders.

Which brings me to the second point -- that since European critics don't pay all that much attention to America, they just repeat concepts like the Big Five out of habit's sake or to use it as a foil to talk about another group. It's a bit lazy. All of this burns me up -- yes, the PSO is probably a better band than some of the Big Five, and maybe LA is too. But it is not all their fault. Until American orchestras look more to their own composers and less to Europe's, the dynamic isn't going to change.