Bob Smizik's Blog

Author

Veteran sports commentator Bob Smizik offers his strong views on the major sports topics of the day.

Register to comment
Guide to commenting

Bob's Q&A

Have a question for me on sports? Click here to e-mail your question to me ... I'll answer as many as I can in future blog posts.

 

Blog Roll

Sports blogs
Steelers: Blog 'n' Gold
Penguins: Empty Netters
Pirates: PBC Blog
College Sports: Redshirt Diaries
High School: Varsity Blog
Fantasy Sports: The Fantasy Factor
 
Sports online

Letters: It was Wannstedt's fault

Sunday 10:30 a.m. 

 

Q: Dave (Wannstedt) keeps the offense bottled up for too long in games that he deems too important to lose with an ultra-conservative game plan and it lets the other team hang around and remain in striking distance and gives them a chance at the end to beat us. That was the case against North Carolina State and almost in the Notre Dame game. He let the offense loose too late at the end of the game (against West Virginia) and it performed. He has the weapons, use them the whole game! His approach consistently leads to a football team that struggles all year to gain momentum and respectability, only to falter in the big games at the end.

Gregg Murawsky


Bob Smizik: This is the classic case of the fan who does not recognize there’s another team on the field. Wannstedt didn’t bottle up the Pitt offense, West Virginia did. Wannstedt did use his weapons -- Jonathan Baldwin and Dion Lewis -- extensively. Lewis carried 25 times, which was MORE than his season average. Dave WannstedtBaldwin caught eight passes, which was MORE than his season average. Pitt threw deep to Baldwin on several occasions, not just late in the game.

The so-called ``ultra conservative’’ game plan you cited vs. NC State produced 31 points in the first three quarters.

What some fans can never understand or are unwilling to acknowledge is the other team plays a role in how well their team plays. Yes, Pitt lost the game, but West Virginia also won it.

_________

 

Q: First and 10 from the Kansas City 11-yard line. What do the Steelers do? Empty backfield and Ben Roethlisberger throws an interception. There can be no denial: The Steelers throw the ball too much. When you throw the ball that much, bad things can and will happen. (Offensive coordinator) Bruce Arians needs to be reeled in.

Did you see Studebaker ( a linebacker) outrun Santonio Holmes after the interception? What the heck was that?

Mike Long

 

Bob Smizik: If the throw from Roethlisberger had been good for a touchdown, no one would have said a word. I have no problem with them passing on first down from the 11, empty backfield or not. All teams do it. Roethlsiberger also threw for three touchdowns in the red zone in that game.

There’s a saying in football that when you throw the ball, three things can happen and two of them are bad -- completion, incompletion and interception. Well, when you run the ball, three things can happen and two of them are bad: gain, loss, fumble.

Thanks for pointing out that Holmes, a wide receiver from Ohio State, could not catch or gain ground on Studebaker, a linebacker from Division III Wheaton. It looked like Holmes’ heart wasn’t in it

__________

 

Q: Why doesn't Mike Tomlin get rid of Bob Ligashesky and Amos Jones (the special teams coaches)? It’s not always the coaches fault and comes down to the players executing, but someone needs to take responsibility on the failure of the special teams.

Rob Pastorius

 

Bob Smizik: I’m not so sure it’s a good idea to fire coaches in the middle of the season. There’d be a steep learning curve for the new coach in terms of knowing the personnel. I think Tomlin needs to get more hands-on and the personnel needs adjusted. I would be surprised if at least one of the special teams coaches was not fired after the season.

_________

 

Q: Whatever happened to the coffin-corner kick? Not only the Steelers but other teams ostensibly shun this when punting from inside the 50. The coffin corner would seem to be a tactic employed with greater frequency given the cost of missing one is not as substantial as the cost of a kick finding its way into the end zone. Am I missing something?

Tom Pandolfo

 

Bob Smizik: I’m not sure kicking the ball out of bounds inside the 20 is as easy as it seems. And you can miss. Sometimes the ball will sail out of bounds at the 22 or 25. I’m not saying it’s a bad idea, but usually when you don’t see a play -- and the coffin-corner kick happens rarely in the NFL and college football  -- there’s a good reason.

__________

 

Q: Two questions: Is Mike Tomlin more involved in planning and calling the defense this season? Reading between the lines – a sentence here and there, I get the impression he is. 

Also, what is the cause of the Steelers poor special teams play? Is it lack of talent? Poor coaching? Poor technique? Being out game-planned? I haven’t seen an in-depth analysis of the problem, and I wonder if you had heard anything. 

George Black

 

Bob Smizik: I’ve seen no evidence that Tomlin’s role with the defense has changed. I believe Dick LeBeau calls the defenses. Tomlin can overrule. I’m sure Tomlin is involved in the weekly planning but I doubt any more than in the past.

As far as problems with the special teams, what about all of the above as the reason for the problem? The matters seems to have received more attention this week, which should have happened about a month ago. It should get better. But it should have got better in October.

Some fans want to blame the special teams coaches. I put them third, behind the players and Tomlin.

__________

 

Q: Great post! Where there is smoke, there is fire. My question to you is when will the local politicians get involved? Plan B cost a lot of taxpayer money and even more political clout. Maybe we should start hammering them to open an investigation? Think there is any merit to that angle?

Stephen Marx

 

Bob Smizik: Andy Chomos, the guy who initiated the stadium walkout in 2008, is encouraging everyone to write their state legislator. It can’t hurt.

Here’s what Chomos wrote: ``It only takes a couple of State Reps to get some action to shake things up. It’s great to post comments to your blog, but that won’t get action, working through your State Rep will.’’

__________

 

Q: How can I, or we as fans, help? With Jason Stark’s article, I feel there is an opportunity to create a wave and pressure on Mr. Nutting. But to be successful in garnering information any requests must be brought forth in a professional unified manner.

Maybe I'm crazy but I do still hold out hope that some day a sense of honesty and commitment will come from the Pirates. Maybe establishing trust with the city and the fans is the rebuilding process that they should be considering.

Dan DeLeo

 

Bob Smizik: As I mentioned above, write you legislator. It probably won’t help, but it can’t hurt.

_________

 

Q: I wanted to thank you for the updated analysis of the Pitt men's basketball team. I try to follow the team, but (living in California) don't get to see many of their games on national television. Now that I have a meaningful breakdown of the individual players, I know I will be able to enjoy the games more.

Eric Schenk

 

Bob Smizik: I thought the player-by-player rundown by Chris Dokish was excellent and certainly gives fans a better understanding of what’s going on with the Pitt basketball team.

 


Posted Nov 29 2009, 10:30 AM by Bob Smizik

Comments

Joe Lawrence wrote re: Letters: It was Wannstedt's fault
on Sun, Nov 29 2009 12:10 PM

Hi Bob,

I have to take issue with your response to Mike Long.

Mike's point - and one that many of us are making - has nothing to do with an individual play. It is a repeated pattern over the past three years of throw, throw, throw in the red zone and then finally running the ball on third and long, when its clear we're settling for a field goal. Perhaps Arians and Tomlin lack confidence in the O-line's run blocking?...

 

(I went back to the KC game and did a very quick glance at the play by play. I counted 12 plays in the red zone. Six runs, six passes Three of the passes were for TDs, one more was completed, one was incomplete and one was intercepted. Again, that was done quickly but it looks to be a pretty good ratio to me. I am only speaking of this one game. --- Bob Smizik)

pittfaninlioncountry wrote re: Letters: It was Wannstedt's fault
on Sun, Nov 29 2009 12:52 PM

6-2 and three of the next five games against the worst teams in the league. Now playing in Baltimore with Dixon behind center, not even Stephen King could of dreamed up this carnage. Even with a probable loss tonight, I still can see them running the table and getting to 11-5 and a possible wildcard berth.

It is time to part with Batch also, he may know the offense and is a great team guy, but what good is he when he gets injured opening his eyes in the morning. Spare me that anyone can get injured, he is far to fragile and this is his track record plain and simple.

Memo to Reed, just kick the ball out of bounds. Starting at the 40 would be an upgrade 70% of the time. Then I would not have to watch the pathetic kicks comming down at the 25 or when you do manage to get it to the 10 with no hangtime its back at the 35 in no time. I would insert a joke here about your tackling ability, but that has been done before.

Fear the towel DESPENCER and Pittsburgh's Finest!

sarcastic sword wrote re: Letters: It was Wannstedt's fault
on Sun, Nov 29 2009 3:01 PM

Regarding the first question, while Lewis and Baldwin were used almost exclusively, WVU knew that - keyed on them and thats one of the reasons the offense was stagnant...

All yr long, Cignetti used play action on first down (this has given Stull time to throw), utilized reverses, screens, Dickerson, Byham....But on friday, it was Lewis on first down - throwing on obvious passing downs - and what the writer was saying i agree with - when in big games, Wannstedt's offense plays to not lose the game - rely on the defense to create turnovers, etc...

When your defense gives up 50% on 3rd down - your QB plays like a freshman and your OL get outplayed, its a recipe for a loss..  Throw in some dumb coaching decisions (46 yd field goal into the wind  - 53 yd fg after the first long field goal looked like a poor attempt) and you get what you deserve.

  • (Lewis wasn't exactly stopped. Nor was Baldwin.  -- Bob Smizik)
Bingram wrote re: Letters: It was Wannstedt's fault
on Sun, Nov 29 2009 4:13 PM

Ther is an old saying that success has many fathers while failure is an orphan. Not in Pittsburgh, where all failures can be laid at the feet of Dave Wannstedt...

I though that Pitt used most if not all of the tools at their disposal and West Virginia responded better than Pitt. Coachs coach, and players play. West Virginia was determined not to lose that game. They wanted it, and they got it. Not the result I wanted, either, but it was the right one..

sonnydrysdale wrote re: Letters: It was Wannstedt's fault
on Sun, Nov 29 2009 4:24 PM

Bob somebody at your paper rported that Holmes ha an ankle injury during the game @ KC

sarcastic sword wrote re: Letters: It was Wannstedt's fault
on Sun, Nov 29 2009 5:45 PM

I never said Lewis and Baldwin were stopped. I said the offense was stagnant....It was very predictable.......Lewis had good yardage but most of those were him making a play due to lack of blocking....the kid is a stud - a joy to watch.....

Imma_Man_Im_40 wrote re: Letters: It was Wannstedt's fault
on Sun, Nov 29 2009 7:17 PM

I don't think Dave Wannstedt was covering / defending against Dorin Dickerson on that pass he dropped right in his mitts.  He's caught that pass all year.  Had it been thrown harder, it wouldda stuck in him.  

Nor do I think DW was wearing #31 when Noel Devine got loose and turned into a shorter version of Jamaican sprinter Usiah Bolt for 88 yards.

Take away those two plays and Pitt wins, even with the missed FGs.  Again, it wasn't a poor coaching scheme problem Friday, it was poor player execution problems.

BlitzBurghDude wrote re: Letters: It was Wannstedt's fault
on Wed, Dec 2 2009 11:02 AM

Bob Smizik: If the throw from Roethlisberger had been good for a touchdown, no one would have said a word.

REALLY BOB???

There’s a saying in football that when you throw the ball, three things can happen and two of them are bad -- completion, incompletion and interception. Well, when you run the ball, three things can happen and two of them are bad: gain, loss, fumble.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Correction Bob...when you throw the ball FIVE tings can happen & FOUR are bad...

- completion

- INCOMPLETION

- INTERCEPTION

- FUMBLE

- SACK