Bob Smizik's Blog

Author

Veteran sports commentator Bob Smizik offers his strong views on the major sports topics of the day.

Register to comment
Guide to commenting

Bob's Q&A

Have a question for me on sports? Click here to e-mail your question to me ... I'll answer as many as I can in future blog posts.

 

Blog Roll

Sports blogs
Steelers: Blog 'n' Gold
Penguins: Empty Netters
Pirates: PBC Blog
College Sports: Redshirt Diaries
High School: Varsity Blog
Fantasy Sports: The Fantasy Factor
 
Sports online

Letters: Tracy most deserving

Saturday, 1 a.m.

Q: What do you think of Jim Tracy being named National League Manager of the Year? Did the Pirates give up on him too soon? And how many games can a manager realistically win for his team?

Bobby Fitzmaurice

 

Bob Smizik: Tracy was very deserving and I’m not surprised he received 29 of a possible 32 first-place votes. No, I don’t think the Pirates gave up on him too soon. I think Tracy was a bad fit for the Pirates. I think he is best with a veteran and more talented team.

As for how many games a manager can win, it depends on the situation. Tracy, for example, took over a good team that had tired of former manager Clint Hurdle. The Rockies were ripe for a new voice. In a situation like that a manager can make a big difference. But in normal circumstances, I might give a manager five wins a year.

_________

 

Q: If Brett Keisel and James Harrison are great special teams players, and the Steelers were leading, 14-7, in the fourth quarter with a minute left and having just scored, would Mike Tomlin send them out to supplement Brett Keiselthe special teams? If not, why not? 

Jack Huber

 

Bob Smizik: I don’t think you can use the present tense in describing the special team play of Harrison and Keisel. Past tense would be correct. If Keisel and Harrison had not been practicing with the special teams, no, I definitely would not send them out. If they had been taking an occasional turn, but nothing serious, in practice, I’d still probably not do it. The only case in which I might use them is if the special teams had had another bad day.

__________

 

Q: After The Bengals went ahead 18-12, the Steelers threw long on first down and we know the rest of the story. That was the time when they needed to get it together and begin putting some first downs together and getting a winning score. Was it too much Monday Night Football or did the Steelers blink?

Dave Hogan

 

Bob Smizik: I think it was too much bad play-calling by offensive coordinator Bruce Arians. I’m slow to criticize play calling because I don’t know all that’s going on, but that series of plays made no sense. The Steelers had enough time that they did not have to try low-percentage long passes.

__________

 

Q: Has the Big East approached Penn State about joining since the defections of Miami, Virginia Tech and Boston College? It only makes sense because before it joined the Big Ten, Penn State dominated this region. But now I see them as a second-tier team. They're biggest losses are in recruiting from this area. In the late 1980s, the good recruits went to Penn State or maybe Notre Dame. Now Pitt and WVU are recruiting well in the area, along with Ohio State. I think Penn State returning to play football locally and the dominance it would have in Big East would guarantee them 10 wins almost every year and a BCS bid every other year. Wouldn't a return of Penn State benefit everyone locally (Pitt and WVU)? It would also bolster the reputation of the Big East in football.

Joseph Polinsky

 

Bob Smizik: I think Penn State is happy in the Big Ten and would not be interested in joining the Big East. Obviously, Penn State would be a great addition but I think the Big East knows it is set in the Big Ten and will not be making any overtures. Penn State won the Big Ten and played in the Rose Bowl last year. They have a good chance of playing in a BCS bowl this year. That is not the mark of a second-tier team.

__________

 

Q: It would seem that Pitt could offer an outstanding high school quarterback the “opportunity” to start for four years at a school on the upswing?

D. Conn

 

Bob Smizik: It is rarely a good idea to promise a high school player a starting role as a freshman. That’s particularly true since Pitt will have two quarterbacks who have been waiting their turn -- Pat Bostick and Tino Sunseri. I'm sure any good high school quarterback knows there's a chance for early playing time at Pitt with Bill Stull leaving, but first he'd have to win the job. No coach will guarantee that.

__________

 

Q: Unbelievable! Pitt is 9 and 1, the best record it has had in 27 years, heading for a conference championship game in a couple of weeks against a team that they can beat and all people want to do is complain about how they weren't perfect. This team and program is on the verge of something special that we have not seen in 27 years. Enjoy it.

I think that some can't stand the fact that Bill Stull is the quarterback and particularly that he is proving them wrong. I, too, had reservations at the start of the season about him being named the starter. But I admit that I was wrong Get over it. He is playing well enough to win and that is all that matters.

Enjoy the ride! Hail To Pitt!

D. B. Kohan

 

Bob Smizik: It’s tough to please some people but in fairness to Pitt fans, not being happy with success is common with almost all teams. Fans love to have something to complain about.

__________

 

Q: Joe Girardi came in last among all of the AL managers who won anything (in Manager of the Year voting). Sometimes you get third place because the guy that placed fourth didn't do anything. And it's not a given any manager would have won 103 games with the Yankees. Almost any manager would have done very well, but 103 wins is really a lot.

Kyle Moylan

 

Bob Smizik: My problem was not so much that Girardi finished third but that he got four first-place votes. I don’t understand that.

 __________

 

Q:  Thanks for passing along the info on the  Buccos money. Looking at the team's young talent, we could have a lot of good players that can help us win. Do you think the Pirates will use this money down the road for signing these talented players to long-term deals? 

Wil Hrovat

 

Bob Smizik:  I'm not quite sure what young talent you're talking about.  Other than Andrew McCutchen and possibly Garrett Jones, who's not so young, I don't see a ``lot of good players.''   As for signing good players to long-term deals, there is no indication the Pirates will do that when the time comes.  But you never know.

 


Posted Nov 21 2009, 01:00 AM by Bob Smizik

Comments

Californication wrote re: Letters: Tracy most deserving
on Sat, Nov 21 2009 5:34 AM

It depends....might use....slow  to critize....it's tough....not quite sure.

Bob, what's up?  

Did the PG HR dept send you a nastygram?

clint wrote re: Letters: Tracy most deserving
on Sat, Nov 21 2009 9:04 AM

"It depends....might use....slow  to critize....it's tough....not quite sure.

Bob, what's up?  

Did the PG HR dept send you a nastygram?"

--hear hear. We demand certitudes, no matter their soundness! : )

BFD wrote re: Letters: Tracy most deserving
on Sat, Nov 21 2009 11:02 AM

I am glad for Jim Tracey...... just goes to show it doesn't matter who manages this team.  Starks column talking about the 80 million in welfare money this team receives speaks volumes of this ownership and the 30 million payroll  is pathetic.  RAISE THE JOLLY ROGER.  Good for Tracey.  I hope all on this team is able to escape Nuttings stranglehold and achieve success outside the Alcatraz that is Nuttings Pittsburgh Prospects.

BFD wrote re: Letters: Tracy most deserving
on Sat, Nov 21 2009 11:07 AM

This quote speeks volumes of how the Pirates are viewed by the rest of baseball

""It's kind of bittersweet news,'' Jakubauskas told me, adding that he was blindsided by the move. "The Mariners called me today and told me what they'd done and my first thought was 'Wow, I hope I get claimed.' Then the next thing they told me was that I'd been claimed by the Pirates.''

tpbco wrote re: Letters: Tracy most deserving
on Sat, Nov 21 2009 11:31 AM

Finally, a Pittsburgh sports writer questions (sorta) the Steeler's OC.  While second guessing play calling (after a loss) is always 20-20 hindsight, some of the issues with the OC are more than JUST the play calling.  And I start with saying yes, I know they won the Super Bowl with him last year and yes, I know BB likes and respects him.  But IMHO, he way to often keeps trying to force an oval peg into a round hole.  As in the "Empty Backfield" set on 3rd an short (2 yards or less) and 1st and goal.   Let's at least make the defense defend the whole field.  How many sacks and/or tipped passes last week from that set?  Of course, part of the reason is the lack of a short yardage back (and the mentality that goes with it).  I chose to believe if the OC wanted one, they'd have one.  We passed up TJ Duckett at least twice (rated as best short yardage back in league 2 years running),  We COULD have signed Cedric Benson (prob for almost free), we COULD have signed Larry Johnson (wouldn't have considered it except for our obvious short comings and after passing on the first 2).  So here we are...it appears that FWP is either done or considered so, which, other than Mendy, only leaves MM and a couple of guys named Joe.  And no I don't believe "Joe" Redman is even remotely the answer.  Another issue is having to play (and win) in Pittsburgh in December and January with that offense on that field (which the team CHOOSES to have).  That playoff loss to Jacksonville 2 years ago comes to mind.  There is (again IMO) a disconnect.  

I really would like to know what percentage of the Offense is due to BB improvs and the "No Huddle".  I'm guessing the answer might be enlightening.

t2pyah wrote re: Letters: Tracy most deserving
on Sat, Nov 21 2009 1:47 PM

Mendehall is beginniing to display he can run in short yardage situations.  

.

He can run between the tackles - he will run to daylight and will run over defenders.

.

A quick glance at Mendenhall's stats ... yds per carry  (high) ... avg nbr of tackles broken ...(high) ....   yards after contact  ..... (high) .......  number of carries for negative yds .. (low) .... . etc ....    show that Mendenhall could/can perform well in short yardage situations (provided he is afforded some sort of hole).  

.

Imma_Man_Im_40 wrote re: Letters: Tracy most deserving
on Sat, Nov 21 2009 4:01 PM

With all due respect to D Conn, I don't think fans really wants to see their team start freshmen QBs in CFB if they think it thru carefully.  Certainly not at Pitt next year!  Our OOCS next year includes three (!!) premium games:  at Utah and Notre Dame, Miami at home.

QB is the hardest postion on the field, and freshman QBs generally don't fare too well, week in week out.  See Michigan, University of.  If memory serves, even Dan Marino didn't play until he was a redshirt freshman.  

I'm anxious to see how far Pat Bostick has progressed under that faith healer Frank Cignetti.  He's worked miracles for Bill Stull that (probably) not even his parents couldda hoped for after the Sun Bowl.  And I think Bostick has better raw materials to work with / start from.

Plus, they say Bostick is like having an assistant coach on the field.  That's the sort of praise they reserve for guys like Tim Tebow.

Finally, from what I hear, that Gonzales kid from Bethlehem is the real deal.  So instead, we'd better recruit some extra defenders, especially CBs: last time I checked, the offensive recruits next year outnumbered defense by a 4:1 ratio.

BlitzBurghDude wrote re: Letters: Tracy most deserving
on Sun, Nov 22 2009 9:35 AM

tpbco,

- Duckett...agreed!

- Benson...disagree

- LJ...disagree (this from a PSU alum)