Ryan Clark should just say no

By Bob Smizik | Wednesday, 12:30 a.m.

A poignant drama has been playing out the past 10 days or so inside the mighty and all-consuming drama that is the Steelers and the National Football League season.

To play or not to play? That is the question Steelers free safety Ryan Clark has been weighing since the NFL schedule was announced in the spring.

Does he take the field in Denver Monday night in a crucial AFC game against the once-beaten Broncos? Or does he sit this one out?

The last time Clark played in Denver the Steelers lost the game and he almost lost his life.

CRyan Clarklark has sickle cell trait, which makes it dangerous for him to play in high altitude. When the Steelers played in Denver on Oct. 21, 2007, Clark’s blood reacted so poorly in the thin air that he became violently ill after the game. The result of that illness was he had his spleen and gall bladder removed and he lost 30 pounds. He did not play again that season. 

At his news conference yesterday coach Mike Tomlin said, Clark has ``received medical clearance to play in this football game.’’

I’m certain Clark finds that reassuring. The Steelers medical staff is first rate. But knowing what he knows, knowing what he went through the last time the Steelers played in Denver and knowing that anything can happen, he understandably remains concerned. He can’t think just about himself. He has a wife and three children.

This isn’t a knee or an ankle. This could be his life.

With the game five days away, neither Clark nor the Steelers have said whether he’ll play.

``The decision lies with him and myself,’’ Tomlin said. ``We’re going to weigh all our options and evaluate things as we proceed throughout the week.’’

That sounds, and this is just a guess, like Clark is probably going to play. If he were not, Tomlin likely would have ruled him out of the game yesterday and the Steelers could have got down to the business of preparing for the Broncos without him.

I hope I’m reading that wrong because I don’t think Clark should play. I understand the Steelers medical staff would not have given him clearance if it felt there were great risk. I also understand Clark will be monitored closely as the game progresses, something that was not done the last time because no one had an idea he would have such trouble in high altitude.

But there’s too much at stake here.

And beyond that, It’s time for someone to stand up and say a football game isn’t worth this. Yes, it’s important and, yes, Clark wants to play. He’s a ferocious competitor. Small as football players go -- 5-foot-11, 205 pounds -- he is fearless on the field and an integral part of a great defense.

He needs sit this one mainly for himself and his family. But he also needs to sit it out to send a message to the thousands of kids, high school players and even college players who willingly and recklessly too often risk their health to suit up for a game.

Clark needs to tell the world that football is second to your health. Football is a chapter in your life. Your health is forever.

The Steelers have a more-than-adequate replacement for Clark in Tyrone Carter.

But even if Carter were not available, for the good of himself, his family and the people who worship the Steelers, Ryan Clark should not be in uniform Monday night.

 

 


Posted Nov 04 2009, 12:30 AM by Bob Smizik

Comments

Santo Gold wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 1:27 AM

If the medical situation with Ryan Clark is as serious as you say, isn't this the time for Mike Tomlin to step up and make the decision for Ryan Clark and deactivate him for Monday's game?  The Steelers medical staff can determine if Clark is  pysically able to play, not if he should play.  That question is left left to the player and/or the team.  Most players are going to say "put me in coach" unless they are physically unable to get on the field, regardless of their own long-term well being.  I'm not sure that the players always have their own best interests in mind.  That just leaves the team/coach to put the brakes on this.  We always tout the Steelers organization as one of the classiest in any sport.  Here's a chance to shine a spotlight on that class, on Monday Night no less.  Do the right thing Coach Tomlin and leave Clark in Pgh.

daquido_bazzini wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 1:51 AM

Ryan Clark should "absolutely not" play next Monday eve....and I feel that the decision has already been made....We (and Denver) just haven't been told.

jstu9 wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 2:35 AM

Terry Long, Justin Strzelczyk, Andre Waters, Mike Webster.

I think that's all I have to say. Luckily guys like Merril Hoge and Troy Aikman seem ok now, but who knows what will happen down the road.

Their health should always be of #1 importance. If he can't compete, then he should retire and spend time with family/friends.

And yes, none of these guys had sickle cell. But it comes down to your health.

If there is seriously a question about this, then he should not play.

schadenfreude wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 2:44 AM

It may well be that the reason Ryan Clark has been given clearance to play is BECAUSE he no longer has a spleen and gall bladder to "clog" his blood flow.

As an aside, medical studies have shown that people who have their spleen removed lose about 5 years off their life span.

That is a sobering thought.

Why they lose 5 years is open for interpretation. It may not be because of the absence of a spleen per se. Spleens are removed for a variety of reasons - accidents, chronic illnesses, etc. The spleen may be affected, yet not be the cause. But the mere fact that a surgeon has to put you "under the knife" indicates that you are unhealthy to some extent vis a vis your peers.

Bob is correct. Ryan Clark should not play, for all the reasons Bob gives, especially life, health and family.

majordad wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 5:51 AM

I agree that he shouldn't play.  Hopefully they're just dragging this out to try to have some effect on Denver's game prep.  I don't know what the Broncos would do differently, they're probably concentrating on how to run their own offense now that the Ravens have shown the Steelers D how to stop them.

kevin morris wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 6:58 AM

I'm no doctor, but it would seem he is running short on disposable organs. They shouldn't even let him on the plane. Even if he would come to no harm, I have to believe it would be a huge distraction to him and his teammates.

SeanE wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 7:19 AM

I agree that he shouldn't play but the teams handling of this situation is odd.  For a coach who wants to minimize distractions durring the week Tomilin has created a monster...unless the decision has already been made and this is all just posturing.

collegesportsfan wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 7:20 AM

If the Steelers were the class organization as alleged, they would have long made the decision for Clark, and not put him in this dilemna.  Even if he has full medical clearance, what do you thnk his wife and children, if old enough, re going through right now?

However, there is another implication.  The way the season is panning out, it is quite possible that the Steelers may have to return to Denver for a playoff game.  If Clark does play this upcoming game without incident, then he can approach the playoff game completely open-minded, whereas, if he doesn't play, then this same situation reoccurs with more (self imposed) pressure on Clark playing.

Niblick wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 9:03 AM

I have to agree with most here in that Tomlin should have already made that decision for Clark. I don't think Tomlin or the organization is handling this in a very classy way. Take the pressure of the guy. It's only one game, conference game or not. I would hope that Tomlin isn't stalling for some strategic reasons. I doubt Denver is going to come up with a new game plan if Clark isn't in there.

SteveG wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 9:04 AM

This is a no brainer.  

He should NOT play.  Tomlin and the organization need to step in for him and take this decision out of his hands.  I suspect that is ultimately what's going on when Tomlin says that the decision is up to Clark and himself.  I read that as him saying that he's giving Clark the chance to make the right decision, but ultimately he's going to make the final decision (meaning not allowing him to play).  That's what I hope anyway.

And he does not need to play to approach a playoff game with an open mind, because he shouldn't play in a playoff game either if it's in Denver.  He simply should never play in Denver again.  This should be very obvious to all.

Meathead wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 9:07 AM

(Clark) has received medical clearance to play in this football game.

End of debate.

pipecock wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 9:50 AM

" I read that as him saying that he's giving Clark the chance to make the right decision, but ultimately he's going to make the final decision (meaning not allowing him to play)."

that is also how i read it. and to be honest, i think that is the best way to go. players obviously always want to play, even when they are injured and shouldn't be. forcing them out without allowing them to come to the decision themselves can cause unnecessary friction with the player. hopefully Clark will come to the right decision by himself and everything will be fine. if he doesn't, Tomlin will step in. if that were not the case, i believe he would have said "the decision is up to the player and the player alone" or something along those lines....

snoel wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 9:59 AM

Meathead has been aptly named.

I'd like to hear from the Bioethicists out there who should contribute to this debate.

By the way Bob, your 100% correct on this one.

BlitzBurghDude wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 11:14 AM

Based on coach Tomlin's statements & more importantly Ryan Clark's statement , upon announcing his medical clearance, he basically said "it's now in the hands of the coach", I'm sure discretion will be the better part of valor.  This is the perfect scenario, as Tomlin will simply deactivate Clark making it a coaches decision, thus eliminating the perception that Ryan chose to not "man-up" even though cleared to play, by those too ignorant to know better.  To question the class of the Steeler organization/coach Tomlin & to suggest that by not showing their hand before they are required to do so is classless...INANE!

chancellorpink wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 11:53 AM

i will be surprised if Clark doesn't play.

sarcastic sword wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 12:59 PM

I will be surprised if Clark plays - Tonmlin and the Steelers should just deactivate him....No game is worth any real life issue - whether or not the doctors have cleared him...

Meathead wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 1:15 PM

The doctors wouldn't have cleared him if there was a problem with him playing.  Or do sportswriters, football coaches, cashiers at McDonalds and parking lot attendants know more about Clark's condition than the doctors?

Pgh_fan_in_NH wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 1:32 PM

The question is, if he does not play and Pittsburgh ends up in Denver for a playoff game, do we go through this all again?

collegesportsfan wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 4:46 PM

I do not care  at all about the medical clearance.   This guy suffered greatly the last time he played there, thus, any possible mental trauma that he and his wife may have is very understandable, especially since it is such a unique circumstance.  If medical clearance is the sole issue, then why hasn't he already been decalred as playing?

Remember, 3 years ago, there were two games when Ben was medically cleared but game results showed that he clearly wasn't ready.  

chancellorpink wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Wed, Nov 4 2009 8:39 PM

Clark's wife told Ryan it is fine with her if he plays.  we'll see how it all shakes out.

PaulH wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Thu, Nov 5 2009 10:50 PM

Ryan Clark should NOT play in this game.

Period.

BlitzBurghDude wrote re: Ryan Clark should just say no
on Fri, Nov 6 2009 10:04 AM

It's a foregone conclusion...coach Tomlin has taken the decision out of Ryan's hands & he will be deactivated Monday Evening...anyone reading all the stories the past two weeks should surmise the same.

Bob Smizik's Blog wrote Letters: Fairness of Pittsburgh fans
on Sat, Nov 7 2009 9:33 AM

Saturday, 1 a.m. Q: I may be in the minority, but I thought the intense booing of Brett Farve's return