Bob Smizik's Blog

Author

Veteran sports commentator Bob Smizik offers his strong views on the major sports topics of the day.

Register to comment
Guide to commenting

Bob's Q&A

Have a question for me on sports? Click here to e-mail your question to me ... I'll answer as many as I can in future blog posts.

 

Blog Roll

Sports blogs
Steelers: Blog 'n' Gold
Penguins: Empty Netters
Pirates: PBC Blog
College Sports: Redshirt Diaries
High School: Varsity Blog
Fantasy Sports: The Fantasy Factor
 
Sports online

Not all dark after loss to Bears

By Bob Smizik | Monday 12:15 a.m.

It looked easy, and I’m not talking about those Jeff Reed field-goal attempts.

I'm talking about how well the Steelers opened the game against the Chicago Bears yesterday with Ben Roethlisberger having his way with the that supposedly ferocious defense and looking to have one of his big games.

Roethlisberger completed 10 of his first 11 passes and it was his arm that was mainly instrumental in the Steelers moving 92 yards on their first possession to take a 7-0 lead and appear headed for victory.

And then it stopped. The Steelers got on more touchdown, in the third quarter, and that wasn’t enough in a 17-14 loss at Soldier Field. It’s easy to blame the Steelers, who were held to one touchdown in the final 50Jeff Reed looking at missed field goal (Peter Diana/Post-Gazette) minutes, but also give some credit to the Bears. They played well.

After completing 10 of his first 11, Roethlisberger was 12 for 24 the remainder of the game, which isn’t what’s expected of him. That’s not to suggest Roethlisberger did not perform admirably, although the case could be made that he was outplayed by Chicago quarterback Jay Cutler.

But Roethlisberger can't be expected to rescue the Steelers every week.

That was Reed’s job yesterday, as it was 10 days earlier, when he delivered a game winner.

In the aftermath of that win over the Titans, it was little remembered that Tennessee kicker Rob Bironas, like Reed one of the most dependable in the NFL, had two chip shots -- from 37 and 31 yards -- that he failed to convert. One was wide, one was blocked. If Bironas makes either one of those attempts, and he almost always does, the game never would have gone to overtime and the Steelers would have lost.

Live by the failed kick, die by the failed kick.

Reed, normally automatic from inside 40 and close to that inside 45, missed twice in the fourth quarter. He was wide left from 38 yards early in the quarter and wide left again from 43 yards with 3:23 remaining.

The field conditions in Chicago were not good but the Bears Robbie Gould, ex of Penn State, had no such problem. His 44 yarder with 15 seconds left won the game.

``I'm just embarrassed because these guys fought their tails off to win the game,'' Reed said. ``It's a terrible feeling. If there's one player who can single-handedly lose the game, then I'll take creit for it today.''

That the Steelers are 1-1 after their first two games is not shocking news. The early schedule -- Tennessee and Chicago -- was not easy. The Titans had the best record in the AFC last year and handily beat the Steelers late in the season. The Bears were expected to be good and were at home.

There no reason to think anything is greatly wrong with the Steelers. The defense held the Bears to less than 300 yards and 17 points. That’s normally good enough to win.

The running game was improved -- 22 carries for 105 yards. That wasn’t the Willie Parker of old, but he did have a 13-yard run. It was a coming out, or sorts, for second-year pro Rashard Mendenhall, whose 39-yard run set up the second touchdown.

Roethlisberger was sacked twice, another area of improvement for the offensive line.

What is somewhat concerning is that the Super Bowl champs have scored three touchdowns in two games. Granted, the opposition has been top flight, but that's not good enough.

The Steelers are at Cincinnati Sunday, and if they can't get into their point total into the 20s or 30s the offensive funk will become alarming. The Bengals, a surprising 31-24 winner at Green Bay, will be primed.

While the Steelers remain the distinct favorite to win the AFC North, after two games it's the Baltimore Ravens in first place.

And so it is that in late September the Super Bowl champs face their first must-win game. Lucky for them it's against the Bungals.

 

 


Posted Sep 21 2009, 12:15 AM by Bob Smizik

Comments

JL wrote re: Not all dark after loss to Bears
on Mon, Sep 21 2009 2:00 AM

We've played tough defenses in both games, but I'm still concerned that our offense has only been able to score 13 and 14 points, respectively. This is directly a function of our O being one-dimensional and not having good blocking for the ground game. I'm not convinced that the handful of good runs we saw (Willie for 13 yards, Rashard for 39) qualify as a ray of hope, yet. But I'll be optimistic. Still,  it'll be a long season if the O can only muster 13 and 14 points when we play quality teams.

kevin morris wrote re: Not all dark after loss to Bears
on Mon, Sep 21 2009 8:48 AM

I know I'm watching the games with a homer's eye, but did they pass a rule making it legal to hold James Harrison?

rmweber94 wrote re: Not all dark after loss to Bears
on Mon, Sep 21 2009 9:17 AM

Steelers are too content to win games 17-13

Navy Author wrote re: Not all dark after loss to Bears
on Mon, Sep 21 2009 9:31 AM

Ochocinco and Chris Henry turned loose on Tyron Carter.  Carson Palmer would like nothing more than to beat us. Next week's game is hardly an automatic W. If I am Mike, Mundy starts or Deshea gets shifted to safety.

Who knows what Mendenhall will do if he is ever permitted to play?

Jeff Reed;  I'd hate to have been the paper towel dispenser in the locker room.

Steeler game rating : SAD FACE :-(  No sacks from the outside backers

Was that a blatant faceguard penalty on Holmes's endzone miss?

Oh, The Pirates lost, could we yet get Bryce Harper?

Louder_Is_Bestest wrote re: Not all dark after loss to Bears
on Mon, Sep 21 2009 9:57 AM

I see problems on the horizon. The offense wasn't exactly a juggernaut last year, and it's certainly been mostly ineffective this year.

But the defense...there's something wrong. No pass rush. And the secondary did not play well. A large part of it was Polamalu being out, but the corenerbacks were also mediocre. Ike Taylor didn't dive for what could've been an INT and had several stupid penalties. Williams Gay was a target who had trouble covering.

Something just doesn't seem right with this team.

jstu9 wrote re: Not all dark after loss to Bears
on Mon, Sep 21 2009 12:33 PM

It's not as if the Steelers are playing terribly, but even though they could be 2-0, they could easily be 0-2 as well.

The days of pounding the ball with Franco or Jerome or even Frank (Pollard) seem to becoming to an end. They had a few good runs but not the continuous pounding of the ball, we are accustomed to.

And the passing game is not a whole lot better. Granted Tennessee and Chicago have good defenses but Matt Schaub put up 34 on the Titans this past weekend.

The run defense is as good as it ever was (aside from a few good runs from Chris Johnson in the 1st game). I don't even know why teams even bother to try to run against us (aside from the occasional run to keep us off balance).

But did Jay Cutler throw more than a couple of passes more than 5 yards down field the entire game? He dinked and dunked us the entire game. And it worked. That is a pretty effective way to neutralize our pass rush while showing off our weakness - our secondary (especially while Polamalu is out). We only gave up 17 points and 275 yards but when we really needed them to stop the Bears, they didn't. The Bears got their 40 yards and kicked the FG.

Even though I do see the weaknesses, we obviously have some major talent and some big-time players. Next week is oddly enough a big game. Cincy just beat the team that beat the team that beat us. We need this game. We need to come out on all cylinders and take it to Cincy. We can't afford to lose division games. And we can't afford to lose another game at this point in the season.

daquido_bazzini wrote re: Not all dark after loss to Bears
on Mon, Sep 21 2009 12:49 PM

I do agree that Willie Gay looked exploited and small. If they weren't going after Carter, they were going after Gay.

At least Carter layed a couple good hits on them, but Gay looked like he was avoiding contact.

Another game or two like that and we could see more  of Townsend or Ratliff. I believe Keenan Lewis is more of a project.

This team (especially the defense) does not look as fast to me as last year.

I'm concerned that age has caught up with a few people and/or lack of conditioning during the Super Bowl off-season.

It all adds up to playing after a Super Bowl win.

It's not easy, and though I'm not throwing the towel in (no pun intended).....I think it's going to be a struggle this year.

Not as bad as '06, but not an overly pretty sight.

gregenstein wrote re: Not all dark after loss to Bears
on Mon, Sep 21 2009 1:53 PM

They've played two games where both basically played to a stand-still and the outcome was decided by special teams. They lost that battle yesterday.

Big Ben has looked at least good both games. It's didn't help matters that Holmes had the drop-sies. You lose games by dropping touchdown passes and then missing the ensuing field goal.

Rook wrote re: Not all dark after loss to Bears
on Mon, Sep 21 2009 3:26 PM

A few years ago we moved up 4 spots to 17 and took Polamaulu from the Colts who loved him at 19. This is a big reason why we have 2 SB wins and Indy has one over the past few years.

Unfortunately 2 years ago the Jets and the Steelers loved Revis but this time we couldn't and/or didn't try to move up a couple places to get him. Timmons is OK but man we'd be good if Revis was in a Steelers jersey. After 2 weeks he's the best defensive player in the NFL.  

cloppbeast wrote re: Not all dark after loss to Bears
on Mon, Sep 21 2009 7:02 PM

I'm slightly concerned, but not much. The Steeler's have basically the same personnel on defense as last year, the only change was an upgrade from Foote to Timmons. The defense held the Titans, who just put up 31 to the Texans, to 10 points, and allowed only 17 to the Bears. Keep in mind, while the Chicago is no offensive juggernaut, Cutler was making some ridiculous plays in the face of pressure, and came through when his team needed it. So, in my humble opinion, the defense really wasn't playing poorly, only Cutler and the Bears were making plays most teams wouldn't make in such situations. Give them credit.

The Steelers on the other hand, untraditionally didn't come through under pressure, leaving 13 points on the field. Dropped passes by Santonio, missed field goals by Jeff Reed, and poor coaching decisions (going for a TD with 3rd and two on the 25 with 3:17 on the clock), contributed to the lack of offensive points.

Admittedly, it is alarming the Steelers lost a close game, which had become their MO last year. Pittsburgh won 6 games in 4rth quarter comeback fashion last year, half of their wins last year. In other words,  the Steelers could have easily been 6-10 last year instead of 12-4 if they didn't come through in the clutch. Hopefully, this isn't a bad omen and only just a hiccup.

Californication wrote re: Not all dark after loss to Bears
on Mon, Sep 21 2009 8:22 PM

Harrison is getting held about 1 of every 3 pass rushes, blantantly.....Woodley not as much but noticeable.

Gay is a "cover" corner....he is not big, not a tackling terror .... he better have more ball skills than he has shown or he's going to get picked on all year.

Steelers biig runs from scrimmage cam off trap plays...like to see more of that as change of pace.

No credible backfield pass catching threat with Willie Parker in game....I like Mewelde Moore every week!