Bob Smizik's Blog

Author

Veteran sports commentator Bob Smizik offers his strong views on the major sports topics of the day.

Register to comment
Guide to commenting

Bob's Q&A

Have a question for me on sports? Click here to e-mail your question to me ... I'll answer as many as I can in future blog posts.

 

Blog Roll

Sports blogs
Steelers: Blog 'n' Gold
Penguins: Empty Netters
Pirates: PBC Blog
College Sports: Redshirt Diaries
High School: Varsity Blog
Fantasy Sports: The Fantasy Factor
 
Sports online

Steelers are so good they're boring

By Bob Smizik | Monday, 12:15 a.m.

I haven’t done the research, but it’s entirely possible that in the era of NFL free agency no team has been better equipped to repeat as Super Bowl champion than the Steelers.

It’s an NFL tradition that lesser teams regularly pick off the best talent from the better teams. Super Bowl champions frequently suffer the heaviest losses. But here come the Steelers, an organization that is the envy of much of the league, not only having lost just two starters from their championship season but having part-time starters -- almost as good or better -- to replace them.

The Steelers lost solid Larry Foote at inside linebacker and have replaced him with potential all-pro in RoethlisbergerLawrence Timmons. They also lost cornerback Bryant McFadden, but replaced him with William Gay. Gay was so good in subbing for an injured McFadden last year that he shared the job the remainder of the season after McFadden got healthy.

The Steelers also return punter Daniel Sepulveda, who missed all of last season and who is significantly superior than the two players who punted last season.

This team is so good it is bordering on boring.

Where’s the hot stories? Where’s the controversy?

They’re buried under a mound of excellence.

I was a panelist on KDKA’s ``Sports Showdown’’ last night and the sexiest Steelers topic they could come up with involved backup running back Rashard Mendenhall. Keep in mind that Mendenhall backs up Willie Parker, a Pro Bowl performer in the prime of his career, and what he does or doesn’t do this season isn’t exactly earth-shattering.

But things are running so smoothly with the Steelers that this passes for a major storyline.

When Max Starks fell on Ben Roethlisberger’s foot in practice last week, it was the biggest news to come out of training camp. And by most reports -- although the Steelers are acting like a hockey team in doling out medical information -- Roethlisberger will be fine after sitting out the team’s exhibition game Saturday night.

Even that game, a loss to the Washington Redskins, failed set off any alarms. What happened to the days when a Steelers exhibition loss was enough to throw the sporting public into an advanced stage of panic?

Fans are too sophisticated today. With Roethlisberger on the sidelines, they know the Steelers aren’t the Steelers and there’s no sense in getting upset. Besides, the game was a good opportunity for Charlie Batch to get more snaps, after missing all of last season. So Roethlisberger’s minor injury was actually a blessing.

Everything is working out perfectly for the Steelers.

Even the much-maligned offensive line has avoided criticism or controversy, as it appears to be shaping up as a worthwhile unit, with Trai Essex, long suspected of having starting potential, getting a chance to be the regular right guard.

The age of the defensive line, once a topic of much concern, doesn’t get much play this year after that group’s stellar showing last season.

There have been the ``hot rookie’’ stories. In the first game it was undrafted running back Isaac Redman of Bowie State, who scored two touchdowns in the win over Arizona. Against the Redskins it was Stefan Logan, a free-agent return specialist who played last year in the Canadian Football League. He had 205 yards of return yardage -- four punts for 48 yards and two kickoff returns for 157 yards. But those kind of stories are typical of every training camp.

With the regular season less than three weeks away, the Steelers are primed and ready to defend their Super Bowl title. Maybe then the football season won’t seem so boring.

Unless they go 16-0.

 

 

 

 

 


Posted Aug 24 2009, 12:15 AM by Bob Smizik

Comments

North Hollywood Yinzer wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Mon, Aug 24 2009 1:14 AM

Umm... err, Bob. These are all valid points you're making, but somehow, this feels like tempting fate here. Not just temping fate, but doing one of those naked-fan-dances-through-bear-traps kind of tempting fate.

But, other than an outdated belief in superstitions/etc., you are profoundly correct, of course.

PaulH wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Mon, Aug 24 2009 1:47 AM

Hope you're on target here Bob?  Everything sounds good; everything looks good, but let's consider some possible problems for the Steelers this season.

First, you know that injuries play the unknown role.  There will be injuries to the Steelers this season.  We have to hope they are minimal and short term, otherwise, problems.

Secondly, the NFL is a competitive knock 'em and sock 'em if it's anything.  Anybody beats anybody on a given day.  Yeah, the schedule looks easier this year.  Yeah, the Steelers are maybe even better than last year and primed for a great run.  But every game they play this year will be with the TARGET on their their backs - Superbowl Champs!  That's gonna count for something, as it did not factor in last season. This team is a bunch of marked players every weekend they come into a foreign city to play.  

It would seem that Tomlin's biggest job this year might be keeping the motivation as high as last season?  Complacency can be like a case of dust mites - always hanging around although you don't notice it.

jstu9 wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Mon, Aug 24 2009 1:49 AM

I think it comes down simply to depth. Losing Foote and McFadden might hurt too much until we lose Timmons or Gay. Do we have the depth that we had last year?

It was nice to see Leftwich or Mewelde Moore or Max Starks come in last year. We all know injuries are going to hit us, so the big issue for me is simply do we have the amount of depth needed for a Super Bowl repeat?

kevin morris wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Mon, Aug 24 2009 7:41 AM

Remember bemoaning the fact that the Steelers couldn't run the ball worth a bucket of spit last year? I don't see anything to show they've healed this Achilles heel.

Alright, I'm reaching, but we have to have something to worry about!

Sharky wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Mon, Aug 24 2009 7:57 AM

I am no sportswriter (I am an engineer) but I have a feeling that 105 + 48 does not equal 205.

Everywhere else I read had him at 4 punts for 48 and 4 kickoffs for 157 which does equal 205.

(Thanks. -- Bob Smizik)

theotherbigben wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Mon, Aug 24 2009 8:14 AM

Bob, of course I hope you're right. But what about the New England Patriots? As great as the Steelers were last year, they certainly benefitted from Tom Brady's injury. That's not to say they couldn't have necessarily beaten a 100-percent Patriots, but they didn't even have to try. I share your enthusiasm about Pittsburgh's camp and roster, but one has to assume New England's excellence w/ Brady back until proven otherwise. They're still incredibly good, clearly a major hurdle to jump in front of another Super Bowl.

Am I overrating them, compared to us? If so, why?  

hwilson wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Mon, Aug 24 2009 8:35 AM

Bob,

I hope you are correct but I have yet to see any "greatness" from Mendenhall or Timmons.  Mendenhall seems reluctant to hit the hole and is not catching passes and other linebackers (Fox) are simply playing better than Timmons.  Hope this is not Steeler hype rather than admitting these two are not as good as projected---which happens to EVERY team in the NFL.

PiratesFanSince1960 wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Mon, Aug 24 2009 9:49 AM

Not arguing with the crux of the article. Just the title :----) Trust me, Steelers are not boring. Football is not boring. I got to watch 49ers with Joe Montana, followed by Steve Young. Lordy, was 14-0 before the first quarter ended. I would go to the black and gold local to me in San Fran area. Watch us win 13-10 on a field goal last 3 minutes, cloud of dust running the ball, on edge of my seat entire game and kinda upset as felt we were a better team that it showed :----)  Drive home, turn on the 1pm 49er game. Kick off, zip, zip, zip with Montana or Young passing the ball, Touch Down! Was beyond amazing. If anyone is boring its them and Tom Brady. Lordy. Zip, Zip, Zip touchdown! Cheers and its gonna be tough to equal in anyway last season, so keep your got the faith helmets on.

It is a fabulously well run team. Amazing dispite all!

David

AustinBurgher wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Mon, Aug 24 2009 10:39 AM

I think the struggles of the offensive line are being written off because of the end result of last season.  In my opinion, a Super Bowl win does not automatically give every aspect of the team a free pass.

I've heard all the injury excuses and how long it takes for a line to play well together.  Fact is, I don't believe the Kemoeatu-Hartwig-Stapleton interior could block for the run even if they've been together for 10 years.  With those guys as starters, the running game will be mediocre at best.  

BigBill wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Mon, Aug 24 2009 11:05 AM

Would have loved to see the Steelers play the Pats this year. Brady is back, but probably a step slower and he wasn't fast or elusive to begin with. I would not be surprised to see him get another injury this year. Also, they lost their offensive coordinator wiz kid and also Cassel their backup QB. It appears the Pats lost more and are in worse shape than the Steelers. Finally, the Steelers get an easier schedule this year.

hondo wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Mon, Aug 24 2009 11:20 AM

AustinBurher is on the mark. People tend to gloss over the deficiencies of this O-line. They are real, and they are still there. They won the Superbowl in spite of it last year, but I still see no evidence that they will be able to consistently run the ball, especially inside the tackles. I also still worry greatly about the health of our QBs. Even Ben, with his elusiveness and play-making ability, can't continually avoid injury when he's harassed so regularly by the pass rush. The line still needs to get much better!

Mr C wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Mon, Aug 24 2009 11:50 AM

Bob,

Got to say I don't agree with you on this point.  While maybe there are not any position battles to speak of I think there are plenty of question marks.  First the Steelers last year, both to their credit and criticism, just barely won many of thier games.  This team could have easily been 9-7, instead of 12-4.  The offensive line has little to point towards and marked improvement, this was a much maligned group for a big reason.  The defense, while was one of the best in franchise history, also is returning a number of players over 30.  The age factor is certainly pushing it.   Also the Steelers had a number of breaks, with Brady being out, the Colts losing in SD in the playoffs and the Titans losing at home, this all contributed to an easire road to the Super Bowl last year.  What is interesting is that this team could improve its overall play and finish with a worse record.  

daquido_bazzini wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Mon, Aug 24 2009 12:07 PM

The Steelers are definitely "loaded" with talent old & new.

But I've been watching the NFL long enough to know that strange things can happen the year after a team wins the Super Bowl.

WDS001 wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Mon, Aug 24 2009 12:25 PM

Bob - I suspect you're a tad over-confident and that Steeler Nation (supreme "fretters" that we are) will call you on that.  

But, if nothing else, this preseason has been great support for the idea of making the preseason two games and extending the regular season by two games.  I've flipped through a few other preseason snoozers on the NFL Network and it looks like every team (other than the Vick-eagles and the Favre-kings) are focused on avoiding injuries and are going through the motions.  It's boring and predictable.  Three more weeks of this until the regular season?  Ugh.......  

Whistle Pig wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Mon, Aug 24 2009 1:23 PM

Bobbyboy ...you're piece makes lots of sense, leaves modest room for discussion, it seems, taking it point by point.

But in total ...it's nothing beyond outrageous.  And any, all even modestly sane betting men would lay a bundle against your conclusion, tongue-in-cheek or otherwise.  Are you simply stirring the pot or do you believe this?

Your treatment of our Steelers reads more like a physics experiment than an expose/essay about what you think you think.  And the trouble is, looking to science, biology and chemistry might be more appropriate disciplinary frameworks to consder the future possibilities and probabilities.

And much as I hate to suggest it, the Ravens may be a major barrier to be dealt with on this super-smooth highway you've mapquested for another super-bowl drive.

ArizonaAl wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Mon, Aug 24 2009 7:22 PM

Well, the Steelers seem to have mastered the art of on-the-field succession planning as well as any team in the free agency era...and that's the required first step for everything else (including contingency planning, i.e., overcoming injuries) to work. Kudos to the team's front office and coaching staff. And while I agree with other posters that anything can happen once the season starts, I'd be extremely surprised to see a reprise of their 8-8 letdown year in 2006, whether or not Super Bowl Trophy #7 shows up next winter.

Whistle Pig wrote re: Steelers are so good they're boring
on Tue, Aug 25 2009 9:39 AM

AZ Al ...agree. Said well, imo.  They'll be bettern 8-8 barring major meltdown/injuries or Roethlisberger's found to be pregnant.

Bob Smizik's Blog wrote Letters: Is Parker HOF worthy?
on Sat, Aug 29 2009 9:04 AM

Saturday, 1 a.m. Q: Great piece on Pete Rose and the Hall of Fame. I think you summed up the conundrum

Bob Smizik's Blog wrote Letters: Is Parker HOF worthy?
on Sat, Aug 29 2009 9:04 AM

Saturday, 1 a.m. Q: Great piece on Pete Rose and the Hall of Fame. I think you summed up the conundrum

Steelers Hangover: Time to Panic! Edition « wrote Steelers Hangover: Time to Panic! Edition «
on Mon, Sep 28 2009 5:37 PM

Pingback from  Steelers Hangover: Time to Panic! Edition «

..Pulling No Punches.... a PM SportsBlog with Sean Conboy » Pittsburgh Magazine Steelers Hangover: So Much for 16-0 (or, Go Get Yourself Some Cheap Sunglasses) wrote ..Pulling No Punches.... a PM SportsBlog with Sean Conboy » Pittsburgh Magazine Steelers Hangover: So Much for 16-0 (or, Go Get Yourself Some Cheap Sunglasses)
on Mon, Sep 28 2009 8:50 PM

Pingback from  ..Pulling No Punches.... a PM SportsBlog with Sean Conboy » Pittsburgh Magazine  Steelers Hangover: So Much for 16-0 (or, Go Get Yourself Some Cheap Sunglasses)

A Eulogy for the 2009 Pittsburgh Steelers « wrote A Eulogy for the 2009 Pittsburgh Steelers «
on Thu, Jan 14 2010 4:26 PM

Pingback from  A Eulogy for the 2009 Pittsburgh Steelers «