Bob Smizik's Blog

Author

Veteran sports commentator Bob Smizik offers his strong views on the major sports topics of the day.

Register to comment
Guide to commenting

Bob's Q&A

Have a question for me on sports? Click here to e-mail your question to me ... I'll answer as many as I can in future blog posts.

 

Blog Roll

Sports blogs
Steelers: Blog 'n' Gold
Penguins: Empty Netters
Pirates: PBC Blog
College Sports: Redshirt Diaries
High School: Varsity Blog
Fantasy Sports: The Fantasy Factor
 
Sports online

Did anti-Steeler bias cost Dawson?

By Bob Smizik | posted at 7:08 p.m.

In bypassing center Dermontti Dawson, the 44 selectors of the Pro Football Hall of Fame today displayed an anti-Steelers bias that cannot be disputed despite the induction of Rod Woodson.

Woodson, an all-time great cornerback and safety who played most of his career with the Steelers, was voted into the Hall along with defensive end Bruce Smith, guard Randall McDaniel, linebacker Derrick Thomas, Buffalo Bills owner Ralph Wilson and wide receiver Bob Hayes, who was a senior candidate.

There is no quibbling here with Woodson and Smith, all-time greats, and McDaniel, a seven-time All-Pro. But how the selectors chose Thomas, who played his entire career with the Kansas City Chiefs, over Dawson is mystifying.

Evaluating most positions in football is difficult because other than quarterback, running back and receiver not many statistics are available.

But here are some numbers about Thomas and Dawson that speak clearly to this injustice. Thomas was All-Pro twice. To give that number some perspective, the Steelers Greg Lloyd, who gets no Hall of Fame mention, was All-Pro three times. Dawson was All Pro six times.

Dawson was the best center in the NFL for most of the decade of the 1990s. Such position domination should be the precise definition of a Hall of Famer. Thomas, whose career paralleled Dawson’s, was the best at his position only twice.

As a linebacker, who once led the league in sacks, Thomas was a more high-profile player than Dawson. But the 44 selectors, all who are expert in the field, should not be blinded by stats or profile.

Was this a case of some selectors deciding there were too many Steelers in the Hall of Fame? That could well be the case, and it’s the only explanation for the snub of Dawson.

Actually, Dawson also finished behind defensive end Claude Humphrey, who was a finalist along with the six who were selected. Dawson was eliminated from consideration before the seven finalists were voted on. Humphrey, like Thomas, was an All-Pro only twice.

Maybe next year when, there is not expected to be another Steeler on the ballot, Dawson’s day will come. It should have come this year, if not sooner.


Posted Jan 31 2009, 07:04 PM by Bob Smizik

Comments

Tim T wrote re: Did anti-Steeler bias cost Dawson?
on Sat, Jan 31 2009 8:40 PM

Amen.

Heth wrote re: Did anti-Steeler bias cost Dawson?
on Sun, Feb 1 2009 8:56 AM

I think both Woodson and Dawson are both HOF worthy.  It probably helped Woodson that he played for other teams and wasn't just a Steeler.  That would lessen the Steeler bias against him.  This would explain  the huge disparity of votes the two received.  

Bettis may benefit from the same situation when its his turn..

bagwell4480 wrote re: Did anti-Steeler bias cost Dawson?
on Sun, Feb 1 2009 11:28 AM

Bob, I get where your going with the whole Dermontti Dawson argument, and with Greg Lloyd, but it should also be factored in the Derrick Thomas did not play a full career, as he was killed in a beileve an automobile accident.

Yes, he only made 2 All Pros, but most likely would have had more than 3 had he played a full career.  

Like I said, I am not saying you are right or wrong, I am just laying all the facts out there.

Penn Hills guy in NC wrote re: Did anti-Steeler bias cost Dawson?
on Sun, Feb 1 2009 3:08 PM

Passing over this man is a travesty.  

BnGFan95 wrote re: Did anti-Steeler bias cost Dawson?
on Sun, Feb 1 2009 3:09 PM

A point of clarification, I don't think Bob is referring to how many Pro Bowls Thomas played in, but how many All Pro teams he made. That's a big difference. All Pro is the biggest honor, obviously.

Additionally, as fantastic of a player s Thomas was, he was past the All Pro stage of his career, at the time of that tragic accident.

Both excellent players, but Dawson was the best of his generation.. That is usually a sure fire ticket to the HOF.

Maybe next year for Dawson....

Bob Smizik's Blog wrote More on the Dawson snub
on Mon, Feb 2 2009 10:23 AM

By Bob Smizik | Posted at 10:24 a.m. Just to reinforce the point we made here Saturday about the absurdity