What is the blues? Who can play the blues? Does blues music become something less if it's not played by "original" bluesmen? Can a white boy sing the blues?
BlueNotes has wrestled with these kinds of questions for many years, while listening to "real" bluesmen like Jimmy Reed and Muddy Waters, and blues interpreters from Eric Clapton to Monster Mike Welch.
A post yesterday by the prolific Bluzer, obviously a great fan of the music, who mentions "white blues imitators," has brought some of these issues back into the BlueNotes frontal lobes.
It's worth talking about, I think, since so much black blues music has been rediscovered and supported and performed and interpreted by white fans and white musicians. Very specifically, what do we think of musicans like Jorma Kaukonen, who have learned how to play and interpret some of the original blues masters, but does not exactly re-create it the same style? It's kind of like asking what we might think of Mozart's piano music as interpreted by Otis Spann. Or maybe Jerry Lee Lewis. Or is it? Hey, I only ask the questions.
Do we only want to to listen to blues as performed by its originators? Can "Hoochie Coochie Man" only be fully apreciated when done by Muddy Waters, or does the Guy Davis version, on his new CD, "Sweetheart Like You," get equal billing? Does Bobby "Blue" Bland's ""Further On Up the Road" lose anything when sung by Eric Clapton? (An interesting article here.)
There's a whole genre of blues known loosely as blues rock, mostly the creation of young white guys who learn blues licks, but then also learn that their fans would rather listen and drink and dance to something that's a lot more electrifying and familiar.
As Bluzer points out, these bands introduce lots of new fans to a music they might never otherwise hear. But on the other hand, they might never hear the original, in all its blues power and glory. What to do?
BlueNotes tends to take the position that there's lots of good music out there, and it doesn't necessarily have to be the original thing. But he's sort of a purist too. Why listen to CDs of people trying to re-create Muddy when you can listen to Muddy himself? So let's appreciate the blues and the blues interpreters for what they both are -- an original art form and people who pay trribute to that art form in their own way.
Posted
Feb 12 2009, 01:05 AM
by
Jim White