A Pitt grad student asks for an apology from police for Friday's actions:
It should be noted, however, that Friday's activities should in no way be considered a reaction to the G-20.
It
was, instead, a reaction to the excessive preemptive build up of
heavily armed and armored officers in the Oakland area. You are to
blame for provoking this.
You are also to blame for using
volatile and harmful substances near entire buildings of completely
innocent college students - non-lethal does in no way mean harmless.
You
are to blame for massive overreaction where students are concerned. In
the age of instant media, in an age of curiosity, in an age of any
large mass of people simply being interesting, you are entirely to
blame for not being able or willing to separate the idea of bystanders
from those inciting groups of people.You are likely to blame for
overreacting to what those groups of people were doing - causing
further problems.
You are, in many ways most of all, to
blame for invading Pitt's property trying to break up groups of
innocent students who are curious about what is happening on their
campus, and trying to go home. There was no reason to put armed
officials or non-lethal crowd dispersal through the Quad/Towers area.
That is our campus, and I hold you accountable for making it unlivable
completely unnecessarily. There is no reason your actions in those
areas could not have been replaced by better methods - getting the
university to return to its policy of only allowing students with valid
Pitt IDs to be signed in, for instance, would have left any out of town
inciters in the open. You should have left that area open so that
students would feel safe rather than hunted.
Both
sides acted poorly, but you [should] know better. You have training,
you have people to think about responses, and you are not an
uncentralized mob.
I want an apology.
Posted
Sep 28 2009, 03:25 PM
by
Timothy McNulty